Secondary Prevention Education After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abant Izzet Baysal University86 enrolled

Overview

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of secondary prevention education given to individuals after acute myocardial infarction on physiological parameters, anxiety and quality of life.

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of secondary prevention education given to individuals after acute myocardial infarction on physiological parameters, anxiety and quality of life.The population of the study will be the individuals hospitalized with the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the Coronary Intensive Care Unit of Abant Izzet Baysal University Izzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital. The study will be conducted in a randomized controlled manner with two groups, 43 in the control group and 43 in the secondary prevention education group. CAG (Coronary Angiography) Procedure Training Form, Patient Identification Form, Physiological Parameters Form and Visual Analogue Scale, Spielberg State and Trait Anxiety Scale and Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale will be used to collect data. The data will be collected by face to face interview technique. For descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation or median and minimum-maximum values for numerical variables, number and percentage values for categorical variables will be given. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p \<0.05), skewness and kurtosis coefficients (should be ± 1) and X ̅ / SS \<4 inequalities will be examined at the same time, and the weight in which group will be preferred.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Myocardial Infarction, Acute Anxiety Education Quality of Life

Interventions

Secondary prevention trainingOTHER

Secondary prevention training will be given after acute myocardial infarction

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 75 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * First time AMI and inpatient treatment in the coronary intensive care unit, * Not having received training after AMI \* * Being 18 years or older, * Speak Turkish, * No problem in verbal communication, * Absence of hearing loss, * Not being diagnosed with a psychiatric illness, * Being conscious, * Being volunteer to participate in the study, * Routine check of cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride results at the beginning of the study and at 6 months. Exclusion Criteria: Not having had AMI for the first time * Having received training after AMI * Not willing to participate in the study, * Cannot speak Turkish, * Problems in verbal communication, * Having hearing loss, * Having a diagnosis of psychiatric illness, * Unconsciousness. * Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride results were not routinely checked at the start and 6 months of the study.

Locations (1)

Abant İzzet Baysal University

Merkez, Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

means of subjective anxiety scores

Spielberg State- Trait Anxiety Scale. The total score between 0-19 obtained from the state anxiety scale shows that there is no anxiety, the total score between 20-39 indicates mild, the average score between 40-59 indicates moderate, and the total score between 60-79 indicates severe anxiety, and over 60 points are needed for professional help. The scores obtained from the trait anxiety scale vary between 20 and 80. A high score means a high and a low level means anxiety

Time frame: six months

means of subjective quality of life scores

It consists of 35 items and the quality of life is based on physical activity (12 items), insecurity (9 items), emotional response (4 items), addiction (3 items), diet (3 items), concerns about medication (2 items), Each sub-dimension of MIDAS, which measures seven domains as (2 items), is scored between 0-100. High scores indicate poor health.

Time frame: six months

Secondary Outcomes

means of subjective pain score

visual analog scale. It consists of a straight line with endpoints that define end limits such as "no pain" and "pain as bad as possible". The patient is asked to mark the level of pain on the line between the two endpoints.

Time frame: six months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.