MaaT013 showed interesting results in steroids and ruxolitinib-resistant aGVHD patients with gut involvement (55% ORR at D28) and 47% and 39% OS at 6 and 12 months respectively (Malard 2020), therefore warrant being tested as salvage therapy in steroid and JAK inhibitors-resistant GI-aGvHD patients. Given the absence of an approved 3rd line strategy or 2nd line strategy in ruxolitinib intolerant patients and the extremely poor prognosis of these patients, who are mostly left with no viable therapeutic option, a single-arm open-label design was proposed.
Standard first-line therapy for the treatment of acute GVHD involves corticosteroids, usually methyl-prednisolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg per day (Martin PJ R. J., 2012; Van Lint MT, 1998). Despite initial responses (around 60%), fewer than half of patients have durable complete responses, and those patients who do not respond or progress after an initial response have high mortality (Weisdorf D, 1990; Alousi AM, 2009; Bolanos-Meade J, 2014). Moreover, prolonged high-dose corticosteroids (CS) exposure is associated with deleterious complications and long-term morbidity (Mohty M, 2010). For these reasons, there is great interest in identifying effective therapies for corticosteroid-resistant aGvHD and improve outcomes. Recently, ruxolitinib (Jakafi®), which has an Orphan Drug status in the USA, was granted an approval on 24 May 2019 from the FDA based on study INCB 18424-271 (NCT02953678). This open-label, single-arm study enrolled 72 grade 2-4 SR-aGvHD patients who were treated with 5 mg (possibly increased to 10mg) ruxolitinib b.d. Of the 72 patients, 49 were included in the efficacy evaluation that led the FDA to grant market authorization. Of these 49 patients, Overall Response Rate (ORR - Complete + Very Good Partial + Partial Responses) after 28 days was 100%, 40.7% and 44.4% for patients with Grade 2, Grade 3, and Grade 4 aGVHD respectively. The overall survival (OS) estimate at 6 months was 51.0% for the entire cohort. The more recent REACH2 phase 3 randomized trial (NCT02913261) investigating ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD has further established the role of ruxolitinib in the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory acute GvHD. The ORR at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib than in the control group (62% versus 39%; odds ratio, 2.64; 95%CI, 1.65-4.22; P\<0.001). Similarly, the durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib than in the control group (40% versus 22%; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43-3.94; P\<0.001) (Zeiser R, 2020) In the REACH1 and REACH2 trials, 45% and 38% of patients, failed to respond to ruxolitinib at day 28, respectively. Moreover, in the REACH2 trial, the overall response at day 56 after initiation of therapy decreased from 62.3% at D28 after initiation of therapy to 39.4% at D56, suggesting a clear unmet medical need for those patients who failed to respond at D28, or worsened afterwards (Zeiser R. 2020). More importantly, results from the REACH1 trial showed only a 22% probability of survival at 2 months in ruxolitinib-non responder patients (Jagasia 2020). MaaT013 is made of allogeneic, full-ecosystem pooled biotherapeutic intestinal microbiota manufactured by MaaT Pharma in Lyon, France, according to GMP requirements. The intestinal microbiota material in its natural environment is derived from healthy, strictly-vetted and selected donors, following the European consensus recommendations (Cammarota 2016) with the purpose of minimizing the risk associated with fecal material transplants (FMT) for clinical research. Thus, prior to donation, donors undergo a thorough medical evaluation and laboratory screening including SARS-CoV-2 detection, to avoid any known contamination risk. MaaT013 is administered as an enema. MaaT013 showed interesting results in steroids and ruxolitinib-resistant aGVHD patients with gut involvement (55% ORR at D28) and 47% and 39% OS at 6 and 12 months respectively (Malard 2020), therefore warrant being tested as salvage therapy in steroid and JAK inhibitors-resistant GI-aGvHD patients. Given the absence of an approved 3rd line strategy or 2nd line strategy in ruxolitinib intolerant patients and the extremely poor prognosis of these patients, who are mostly left with no viable therapeutic option, a single-arm open-label design was proposed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
66
MaaT013 is made of allogeneic, full-ecosystem pooled biotherapeutic intestinal microbiota
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen
Linz, Austria
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende - Campus Sint-Jan
Bruges, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brussels, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
ORR of gastro intestinal-aGvHD
Overall Response Rate (Complete Response + Very Good Partial Response + Partial Response)
Time frame: Day 28
Safety and tolerability
Incidence of AEs, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), deaths, and laboratory abnormalities related to MaaT013, using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0., and results from physical examination from D1 to Day 28.
Time frame: Day 28
Safety and tolerability
Incidence of AEs, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), deaths, and laboratory abnormalities related to MaaT013, using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI-CTCAE) v5.0.
Time frame: Month 3
Safety and tolerability
incidence of SAE and key events
Time frame: Month 12
aGvHD ORR
aGvHD overall response rate (CR, VGPR and PR) for all organs
Time frame: Day 28, Day 56 and Month 3
GI aGvHD ORR
GI aGvHD overall response rate (CR, VGPR and PR)
Time frame: Day 56 and Month 3
Best response rates
CR, VGPR and PR for GI and overall aGvHD
Time frame: until Month 3
Survival rates
Progression-free survival, relapse-free survival, overall survival, steroid-free survival, immunosuppression-free survival
Time frame: Month and Month12
Duration of response
Duration of response after D28
Time frame: Month 12
chronic GvHD incidence and severity
Percentage of chronic GvHD incidence and severity
Time frame: Month 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ghent, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
Liège, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie - Site Sud
Amiens, France
Centre Hosptitalier Universitaire d'Angers
Angers, France
CHU de Caen
Caen, France
...and 40 more locations