The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of occipito-cervico-thoracic spine surgery using posterior fixation as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and patients reported outcomes (PROs).This study is being undertaken to identify possible residual risks and to clarify mid-to long-term clinical performance that may affect the benefit/risk ratio of posterior fixation systems.
This study is a prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and performance of select occipito-cervico-thoracic posterior fixation systems in patients who undergo posterior fixation fusion surgery. Consecutive patients at a given site who meet eligibility requirements will be asked to consent to participate in the study. These patients will present with traumatic, reconstructive, and/or tumor conditions in the craniocervical, cervical, and/or upper thoracic spine that are amenable to surgical treatment and will be screened prior to study enrollment. Once enrolled in the study, subjects will undergo posterior occipito-cervico-thoracic fixation surgery using one of the NuVasive posterior fixation systems (Vuepoint II OCT or Reline-C) based on the surgeon's standard of care. At least 150 subjects (a minimum of 75 in each implant arm) will be enrolled and will be followed for 24 months after the surgery.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
150
observational
UC Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
Hartford Healthcare Bone & Joint Institute
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
MedStar Health Research Institute
Hyattsville, Maryland, United States
NY Spine Institute
New York, New York, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Houston Methodist
Houston, Texas, United States
Complications of Posterior Fixation System
Rate of complications (i.e., safety) attributable to the use of the associated posterior fixation system.
Time frame: 24 months
Radiographic Success
The proportion of subjects with apparent radiographic success at: 1. Latest timepoint available for patients undergoing surgery to treat advanced stage tumors 2. 24 months postoperative for subjects undergoing surgery to treat instabilities, traumatic spinal fractures, failed previous fusions, or degenerative disease
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline for neck/arm pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
Neck and arm pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet MCID (2.5 points and 2.5 points respectively) where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Unbearable Pain".
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline for disability measured by the neck disability index.
Disability measured by the neck disability index (NDI) will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet MCID (7.5 points) where a higher score on the NDI indicates a more severe disability.
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline measured by overall physical and mental health from PROMIS-10.
Overall physical and mental health measured by PROMIS-10 will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet MCID (5 points). PROMIS-10 scoring uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for neck/arm pain as compared to baseline for neck/arm pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
Neck and arm pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet SCB (3.5 points) where 0 is "No Pain" and 10 is "Unbearable Pain".
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting substantial clinical benefit (SCB) as compared to baseline for disability measured by the neck disability index.
Disability measured by the neck disability index (NDI) will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet SCB (9.5 points) where a higher score on the NDI indicates a more severe disability.
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting substantial clinical benefit (SCB) as compared to baseline measured by overall physical and mental health from PROMIS-10.
Overall physical and mental health measured by PROMIS-10 will be assessed to determine the percentage of subjects who meet SCB (6.8 points). PROMIS-10 scoring uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.
Time frame: 24 months
Rate of complications attributable to the use of any additional NuVasive instruments, implants, or technologies
Rate of complications attributable to the use of any additional NuVasive instruments, implants, or technologies.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.