Sonova Hearing Systems pass through different development and study stages. At an early stage, feasibility studies are conducted to investigate new algorithms, features and functions in an isolated manner. If the benefit is proven, their performance is then investigated regarding interdependency between all available algorithms, features and functions running in parallel in a hearing aid (pivotal/pre-validation studies) and, as a result, they get optimized. Afterwards, and prior to product launch, the Sonova Hearing Systems undergo a final quality control in terms of clinical trials. This is a confirmatory study, investigating benefits of a modified hearing aid loudspeaker. This will be a clinical investigation which will be conducted mono centric at National Acoustic Laboratories a well known institution with exceptional experience (Australia).
In this study a comparison with two Phonak Receiver in Canal (RIC) devices is done. The experimental device with a modified hearing aid loudspeaker concept and the active comparator with the existing technology will be compared regarding speech intelligibility, listening effort and sound quality in speech in noise, quiet situations for people with mild to moderate hearing losses.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
23
The new hearing aid loudspeaker will be fitted to the participants individual ear anatomy and hearing loss.
The standard hearing aid loudspeaker will be fitted to the participants individual ear anatomy and hearing loss.
National Acoustic Laboratories
Sydney, Australia
Evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality for different loudspeaker
The Primary Outcome measure of this study is the comparison of the standard hearing aid loudspeaker with the modified one in regard to speech intelligibility in a noisy environment and sound quality in a quiet situation. The speech intelligibility will be measured using a speech test in dB SRT and the sound quality will be assessed by subjective rating, using percentage of satisfaction from "very satisfied (100)" to "very unsatisfied (0)".
Time frame: 2 weeks
Evaluation of listening effort for different loudspeaker.
The Secondary Outcome measure of this study is the comparison of the standard hearing aid loudspeaker with the modified one in regard to listening effort in a noisy environment. The listening effort of speech will be assessed by subjective rating, within 13 steps, from "not effortful at all" to "only noise".
Time frame: 2 weeks
Evaluation of sound quality of own voice for different loudspeaker.
The Secondary Outcome measure of this study is the comparison of the standard hearing aid loudspeaker with the modified one in regard to sound quality in quiet. The sound quality of own voice will be assessed by subjective rating, using percentage of satisfaction from "very satisfied (100)" to "very unsatisfied (0)".
Time frame: 2 weeks
Evaluation of sound quality of streamed signals for different loudspeaker
The Secondary Outcome measure of this study is the comparison of the standard hearing aid loudspeaker with the modified one in regard to sound quality of a streamed signal in quiet and noise.. The sound quality of the streamed signal will be assessed by subjective rating, using percentage of satisfaction from "very satisfied (100)" to "very unsatisfied (0)".
Time frame: 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.