Nearly half a billion people suffer from disabling hearing loss. The most common form of hearing loss in adults is age-related hearing loss (ARHL), which causes a reduced ability to understand speech in noisy environments. The ability of people with ARHL to communicate is therefore greatly impacted, limiting their social interactions and thus their quality of life. Yet, the wear of hearing aids - which is the current standard rehabilitation treatment in such cases - does not lead to optimal satisfactory outcomes when it comes to understanding speech in noisy environments. The objective of this pilot study is to test a new signal-processing algorithm, based on artificial intelligence, that aims at enhancing the intelligibility of speech-in-noise signals. The efficiency of the algorithm is compared to a standard denoising algorithm commonly used in hearing aids. The primary outcome measure is the word-identification performance of the participants, using the FrMatrix test (Jansen et al., 2012). Two secondary outcome measures are investigated: listening effort (self-assessed using a Likert scale, and measured through response times), and subjective preference (assessed in a paired-comparison task). The study is conducted in 20 normal-hearing subjects and in 40 older (age ≥ 55 years) hearing-impaired subjects.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects will listen to speech-in-noise audio files that are either unprocessed or processed in order to increase speech intelligibility.
Clinique Rive Gauche
Toulouse, France
RECRUITINGSpeech-in-noise word identification
Speech-in-noise word identification score as assessed using the FrMatrix test
Time frame: during procedure, T1
Listening effort
response times recorded during the FrMatrix test
Time frame: during procedure, T1
Listening effort
self-assessed subjective measures of listening effort.
Time frame: during procedure, T1
Subjective preference in terms of speech naturalness
Measures of relative preference using forced-choice pairwise comparisons
Time frame: during procedure, T1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.