Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone

Ain Shams University20 enrolled

Overview

Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by : 1. clinical and Radiographic analysis . 2. Histomorphometric analysis .

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Bone Augmentation

Interventions

Perforated collagen membranePROCEDURE

Horizontal Bone Augmentation using Perforated Collagen Membrane

Occlusive collagen membranePROCEDURE

Occlusive collagen membrane

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 20 YearsMax age: 40 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy adult patients. 2. Both sex, males and females. 3-Age from 20 - 40 years old. 4-All patients will be free from any systemic diseases as evidenced by Burkett's oral medicine health history questionnaire. 5-Remaining alveolar bone ≥ 8mm vertically and ≤ 4 mm horizontally. 6-Gingival biotype 1-2mm thickness. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Smokers. 2. Pregnant and breast feeding females. 3. Mentally retarded Patients. 4. Presence of hematologic disease. 5. Previous radiation, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressive treatments. 6. Diabetes mellitus, metabolic bone disease, ongoing treatment with bisphosphonates drugs, or pregnancy. 7. Anticoagulant drugs, Endocarditis risk factors, renal and hepatic failure

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Horizontal alveolar bone width in mm

Measured By Bone caliber and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Time frame: 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.