The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in combination with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants with metastatic colorectal cancer. The study will also compare lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab with the standard of care treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride). The primary study hypothesis is that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is superior to standard of care with respect to overall survival.
The Global portion, or Global Cohort, will include all participants who are enrolled during the Global enrollment period and will be the primary analysis population for the study. After enrollment of the global portion of the study is complete, the study will remain open to enrollment in China alone until the target number of participants from China have been enrolled to meet local regulatory requirements. The China Cohort will include both participants enrolled in China for the Global Cohort plus those participants enrolled in China as part of the China extension enrollment period. Per the supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP), China participants randomized after the enrollment of the global portion is closed as part of the China extension enrollment period will not be included in the global analysis populations. As pre-specified in the protocol, safety and efficacy outcome measures for the China Cohort will be analyzed separately from the Global Cohort.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
563
Pacific Cancer Care ( Site 0031)
Monterey, California, United States
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of Wellstar Cobb Hospital ( Site 0021)
Marietta, Georgia, United States
University of Chicago Medical Center-Medicine - Section of Hematology/Oncology - Gastrointestinal P
Chicago, Illinois, United States
MFSMC-HJWCI-Oncology Research ( Site 0012)
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital-Oncology Research ( Site 0038)
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Global Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Per the supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP), Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for efficacy separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 35 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1 modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS as assessed by BICR per modified RECIST 1.1 is presented. Per the sSAP, Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1 modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS as assessed by BICR per modified RECIST 1.1 is presented. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for efficacy separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 35 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. ORR per modified RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR is presented. Per the sSAP, Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. ORR per modified RECIST 1.1 assessed by BICR is presented. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for efficacy separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 35 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
For participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions), DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1 modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, or death from any cause, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. DOR as assessed by BICR per modified RECIST 1.1 is presented. Per the sSAP, Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
For participants who demonstrated CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions), DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR or PR until PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1 modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, or death from any cause, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. DOR as assessed by BICR per modified RECIST 1.1 is presented. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for efficacy separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 35 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. Per the sSAP, Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for safety separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 35 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued any study treatment due to an adverse event is presented. Per the sSAP, Final Analysis for the Global Cohort was performed with a data cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023.
Time frame: Up to approximately 22 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 20-Feb-2023)
China Cohort: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued any study treatment due to an adverse event is presented. Per the sSAP, the China Cohort was evaluated for safety separately from the Global Cohort, with Final Analysis performed using a data cut-off of 27-Sep-2024.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months (through sSAP pre-specified Final Analysis database cut-off date of 27-Sep-2024)
Global Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) Combined Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to the questions regarding Global Health Status (GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and Quality of Life (QoL; "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30) combined score is presented. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Global Cohort: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1-5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores meant a better level of function. The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) scale score is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Global Cohort: Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss (Item 13) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire, including a single-item scale score for appetite loss (QLQ-C30 Item 13). For this item, individual responses to the question "Have you lacked appetite?" are given on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much). Scores are transformed to a range from 0-100, with a lower score indicating a better outcome. The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 appetite loss (Item 13) scale score is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Global Cohort: Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer-Specific 29 Items (QLQ-CR29) Bloating (Item 37) Score
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire specific for colorectal cancer, including a single-item scale score for bloating (QLQ-CR29 Item 37). For this item, individual responses to the question "Did you have a bloated feeling in your abdomen?" are given on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much). Scores are transformed to a range from 0-100, with a lower score indicating a better outcome. The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-CR29 bloating (Item 37) scale score is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
Global Cohort: Time to Deterioration (TTD) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) Combined Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in Global Health Status (GHS; EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) \& Quality of Life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30) combined score. Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score, is presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Global Cohort: TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning score (QLQ-C30 Items 1-5). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning score, is presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Global Cohort: TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 Appetite Loss (Item 13) Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (increase) from baseline in appetite loss (QLQ-C30 Item 13) score. Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point change (increase) from baseline in appetite loss score, is presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Global Cohort: TTD in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer-Specific 29 Items (QLQ-CR29) Bloating (Item 37) Score
TTD is defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point deterioration (increase) from baseline in bloating (QLQ-CR29 Item 37) score. Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point change (increase) from baseline in bloating score, is presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Henry Ford Hospital ( Site 0024)
Detroit, Michigan, United States
St. Vincent Frontier Cancer Center ( Site 0005)
Billings, Montana, United States
Providence Portland Medical Center ( Site 0019)
Portland, Oregon, United States
Thomas Jefferson University - Clinical Trials Office ( Site 0027)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Inova Schar Cancer Institute ( Site 0022)
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
...and 85 more locations