This is a multicenter, US-only, phase 1, open-label, dose escalation, non-randomized study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of investigational ChAd and SAM SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in healthy adult subjects. Homologous and heterologous prime-boost vaccination schedules (Stage 1), as well as boost(s) after receipt of COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccines (Stage 2) will be examined. Subjects' willingness to receive ChAd vaccines will be assessed and documented at the time of informed consent and considered to determine group assignments. This phase 1 study will enroll 17 Stage 1 and up to 118 Stage 2 subjects. Eligible subjects will be enrolled in different groups based on their age (18-60 years old and \>60 years old) and their EUA/licensed COVID-19 vaccination status. A sentinel approach with 72-hour (Stage 1, and Stage 2, Groups 5, 6, 8-10, 12, 13-15) or 7-day observation times (Groups 7 and 11) will be used, before recruiting the remainder of each dose escalation group. Decisions about dose escalation will be determined by the SSC with consultation with the DSMB as needed after all subjects in each group have been observed through Day 8 post first study vaccination. All subjects will be followed through 12 months after their last study vaccination. Vaccinated subjects will be carefully monitored for exposure and infection to SARS-CoV-2 throughout the study. Escalation to the highest dose (10 µg) of SAM-S-TCE in younger subjects will proceed only following safety assessments of the 10 µg dose in older subjects for a period of 28 days post-vaccination. In addition, the dosage of SAM-S-TCE given as a double boost to subjects previously vaccinated with the Johnson \& Johnson/Janssen Ad26 COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccine in Groups 8A, 8B, and 12A, 12B will be determined based on the dose escalation reactogenicity and immunogenicity results in Groups 5-7 and 9-11, respectively. After protocol version 9.0 was implemented, it was decided not to enroll subjects into Groups 7 and 8 because of competing priorities and predicted difficulties enrolling into these two groups. The primary objectives of this study are 1) To assess the safety and tolerability of different doses of ChAd-S or ChAd-S-TCE, and SAM-S or SAM-S-TCE when administered as prime-boost in healthy naïve adult subjects, 2) To assess the safety and tolerability of different doses of ChAd-S or ChAd-S-TCE, and SAM-S or SAM-S-TCE when administered as first or second boost in healthy adult subjects previously vaccinated with an mRNA or adenoviral-vectored COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccine.
This is a multicenter, US-only, phase 1, open-label, dose escalation, non-randomized study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of investigational ChAd and SAM SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in healthy adult subjects. Homologous and heterologous prime-boost vaccination schedules (Stage 1), as well as boost(s) after receipt of COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccines (Stage 2) will be examined. Subjects' willingness to receive ChAd vaccines will be assessed and documented at the time of informed consent and considered to determine group assignments. This phase 1 study will enroll 17 Stage 1 and up to 118 Stage 2 subjects. Eligible subjects will be enrolled in different groups based on their age (18-60 years old and \>60 years old) and their EUA/licensed COVID-19 vaccination status. A sentinel approach with 72-hour (Stage 1, and Stage 2, Groups 5, 6, 8-10, 12, 13-15) or 7-day observation times (Groups 7 and 11) will be used, before recruiting the remainder of each dose escalation group. Decisions about dose escalation will be determined by the SSC with consultation with the DSMB as needed after all subjects in each group have been observed through Day 8 post first study vaccination. All subjects will be followed through 12 months after their last study vaccination. Vaccinated subjects will be carefully monitored for exposure and infection to SARS-CoV-2 throughout the study. Escalation to the highest dose (10 µg) of SAM-S-TCE in younger subjects will proceed only following safety assessments of the 10 µg dose in older subjects for a period of 28 days post-vaccination. In addition, the dosage of SAM-S-TCE given as a double boost to subjects previously vaccinated with the Johnson \& Johnson/Janssen Ad26 COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccine in Groups 8A, 8B, and 12A, 12B will be determined based on the dose escalation reactogenicity and immunogenicity results in Groups 5-7 and 9-11, respectively. After protocol version 9.0 was implemented, it was decided not to enroll subjects into Groups 7 and 8 because of competing priorities and predicted difficulties enrolling into these two groups. The primary objectives of this study are 1) To assess the safety and tolerability of different doses of ChAd-S or ChAd-S-TCE, and SAM-S or SAM-S-TCE when administered as prime-boost in healthy naïve adult subjects, 2) To assess the safety and tolerability of different doses of ChAd-S or ChAd-S-TCE, and SAM-S or SAM-S-TCE when administered as first or second boost in healthy adult subjects previously vaccinated with an mRNA or adenoviral-vectored COVID-19 EUA/licensed vaccine. The secondary objective of this study is to assess the humoral immunogenicity of ChAd-S or ChAd-S-TCE, and SAM-S or SAM-S-TCE.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
81
Chimpanzee Adenovirus serotype 68 - Spike (ChAdV68-S) is a replication-defective, E1, E3 E4Orf2-4 deleted adenoviral vector based on chimpanzee adenovirus 68 (C68, 68/SAdV-25, originally designated as Pan 9), which belongs to the sub-group E adenovirus family. A single 0.5 mL intramuscular injection will be administered in the deltoid muscle. When possible, the prime vaccine and boost vaccine should be administered in different arms.
Chimpanzee Adenovirus 68 - Spike plus additional SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes (ChAdV68-S-TCE) is a replication-defective, E1, E3 E4Orf2-4 deleted adenoviral vector based on chimpanzee adenovirus 68 (C68, 68/SAdV-25, originally designated as Pan 9), which belongs to the sub-group E adenovirus family. A single 0.5- or 1.0-mL (depending on dose level) intramuscular injection will be administered in the deltoid muscle. When possible, the prime vaccine and boost vaccine should be administered in different arms.
Self-Amplifying mRNA - Lipid Nanoparticles - Spike (SAM-LNP-S) is a SAM vector based on Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV). A single 0.25 mL or 0.5 mL (depending on dose level) intramuscular injection will be administered in the deltoid muscle. When possible, the prime vaccine and boost vaccine should be administered in different arms.
Self-Amplifying mRNA - Lipid Nanoparticles -Spike plus additional SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes (SAM-S-TCE) is a SAM vector based on Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV). A single 0.25 or 0.5 mL (depending on dose level) intramuscular injection will be administered in the deltoid muscle. When possible, the prime vaccine and boost vaccine should be administered in different arms.
The diluent used for this study will be 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, and is a sterile, nonpyrogenic, isotonic solution of sodium chloride and water for injection. Each milliliter (mL) contains sodium chloride 9 mg. It contains no bacteriostat, antimicrobial agent or added buffer and is supplied only in single-dose containers to dilute or dissolve drugs for injection. 0.308 mOsmol/mL (calc.). 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP contains no preservatives.
The Hope Clinic of Emory University
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Saint Louis University Center for Vaccine Development
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
The University of Washington - Virology Research Clinic
Seattle, Washington, United States
Frequency of Any New-onset Chronic Medical Conditions (NOCMCs)
Number of participants that experienced any NOCMCs during the course of the study
Time frame: Day 1 to study completion through up to 1 year post last dose
Frequency of Any Potentially Immune-mediated Medical Conditions (PIMMCs)
Number of participants that experienced any PIMMCs during the course of the study
Time frame: Day 1 to study completion through up to 1 year post last dose
Frequency of Any Medically Attended Adverse Events (MAAEs)
Number of participants that experienced any MAAEs during the course of the study
Time frame: Day 1 to study completion through up to 1 year post last dose
Frequency of Any Laboratory AE
Number of participants that experienced any laboratory AE
Time frame: Through 7 days post each study vaccination
Frequency of Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
The number of participants that experience any SAEs from Day 1 to study completion. An AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious if, in the view of either the participating site PI or appropriate sub-investigator or the sponsor, it results in: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time frame: Day 1 to study completion through up to 1 year post last dose
Frequency of Systemic Solicited Reactogenicity Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants who experienced any systemic solicited AEs through 7 days post any vaccination. Systemic events include: fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, chills and fever.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 8 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15 and through 7 days post any vaccination for Groups 1, 3A, 3b and 4.
Frequency of Local Solicited Reactogenicity Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants who experienced any local solicited AEs through 7 days post any vaccination. Local events include: pain at injection site, erythema, and induration.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 8 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15 and through 7 days post any vaccination for Groups 1, 3A, 3b and 4.
Frequency of Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants who experienced any unsolicited AEs through 28 days post vaccination
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 29 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15 and 28 days post any vaccination for Groups 1, 3A, 3b and 4.
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
Time frame: Day 57 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vac 1 (85 Days Post Vac 2), Day 265 Post Vac 1 (181 Days Post Vac 2), Day 450 Post Vac 1 (366 Days Post Vac 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
Time frame: Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vaccination 1 (85 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 265 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 450 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean in Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 1 and 3A
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 3B and 4
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean in Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G S-2P
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1 S-2P
Time frame: Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5 S-2P
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G S-2P
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.1 S-2P
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.4/5 S-2P
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vaccination 1 (85 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 265 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 450 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against D614G S-2P
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.1 S-2P
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.4/5 S-2P
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 1 and 3A
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154. To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 1 and 3A
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 3B and 4
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot.
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1