The cartilage articular defects of the knee are extremely disabling lesions and represent one of the predisposition causes to the development of articular arthrosis. When clinical symptoms are present, exist the indication to treat the patient surgically, to this end, several surgical techniques could be performed, as the microfractures, osteochondral transplantation (OCT) or chondrocytes autologous transplantation (ACT). The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a modified version of the ACT technique, the All Autologous Cartilage Repair technique (AACR). A one-step technique in which the healthy cartilage harvested is fragmented directly in situ and then mixed with the autologous platelet concentrate and directly injected in the cartilage defect.. This lead to a less invasive surgery and cost-effective procedure. The performance will be evaluated through the evaluation of clinical results and complications after surgery other than the evaluation of the quality of the cartilage tissue repaired.
The aim of the Pilot Study is to describe the clinical performance of the AACR technique in the treatment of the cartilage defects in terms of complications after surgery, quality of the repaired cartilage tissue and clinical results with regard to pain and function of the treated knee. The quality of the repaired cartilage tissue will be evaluate through MRI and clinical outcomes by the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). All patients will undergo to a blood sample (used to product the patient's own platelet concentrate) and an arthroscopic procedure to debride degenerated cartilage tissue and to the harvesting of the surrounding healthy cartilage. The fragmented healthy cartilage will mixed with the platelet concentrate (PC) and injected directly into the cartilage defect to fill it. The platelet concentrate stimulates the healing of the cartilage most actively. Before and after surgical treatment all patient will undergo to a follow-up visits after 6, 12 and 24 months. MRI will be performed at pre-surgery visit and at the 12 and 24 follow-up visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
All patients will undergo firstly to a blood sampling and then to the arthroscopic debridement of the damage cartilage and subsequently will be harvested the surrounding healthy cartilage The harvested and healthy cartilage will shredded directly in situ with a shaver. This cartilage will then mixed with the patient's own Platelet Concentrate and may be injected directly into the cartilage defect. The Platelet Concentrate stimulates the healing of the cartilage most effectively. At the same time, the Platelet Concentrate will also used to produce autologous fibrin glue, which can be used to fix the applied cartilage chip / Platelet Concentrate product quickly and safely in the damaged cartilage.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Italy
Change in knee functionality assessed by KOOS
The primary clinical outcome is the change in knee functionality assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire over 2 years (before treatment, at baseline, versus 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative). The KOOS is a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to asses patient-relevant outcomes following knee injury. It is a self-completion questionnaire with a 1-week-recall-period with 42 items and 5 subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily life, sport and leisure, quality of life associated with the knee joint). Each question has five answering options, scored with a numerical value of 0 - 4. In average, it takes 10 minutes to complete. The calculation of the respective sub-score is done by adding up the marked items of the relevant subscales. These numerical values are then converted into a scale value between 0 (extreme knee problems) and 100 (free of knee joint complaints).
Time frame: (before treatment, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
Quality of cartilage repair tissue MRI evaluation
The quality of cartilage repair tissue will be assessed with the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART). The MOCART score is the variable of primary interest because it allows both the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue and the surrounding structures. The MOCART score is based on nine variables measured on a standard MRI and added up to a score, ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best score and a score of 0 represents the worst score.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
Difference between baseline and follow-up visits of the physical examination
The physical examination will evaluate the knee swelling, dynamic and static alignment.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Marx activity rating scale (MARS)
is patient-administered and takes only 1 minute to complete. It includes 4 items that assess the frequency of running, cutting, decelerating, and pivoting based on the subjects "healthiest and most active state in the past year." Each question has five answering options, scored with a numerical value of 0 - 4. The score of all items is summed up for the total score, which ranges from 0 (lowest physical or sporting activity) to 16 (highest physical or sporting activity).
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain
is a single item question about the average pain on ordinary days with average physical activity, where numerical answers are anchored by 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst possible pain)
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Baseline quality of cartilage repair tissue MRI evaluation
The AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth \& Underlying Structures) scoring system includes the three most important different parameters that describe a focal chondral or osteochondral defect prior to possible cartilage repair surgery: (1) the cartilage defect area, which is measured ("area measurement"); (2) the cartilage defect morphology/depth ("depth"); and (3) the underlying structures with presence of adjacent osseous defects/subchondral cysts and bone marrow edema-like lesions (BME) ("under- lying structures"). In addition to the resulting AMADEUS code, sub-scores were defined for each feature, which sum up to a total score of 100 (no osteochondral defect) to 0 (worst score).
Time frame: baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.