This is a Phase II, randomized, blinded, active-controlled, global, multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lomvastomig and tobemstomig, compared with nivolumab, in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine- or taxane- and platinum-based regimen. Following approval of the protocol amendment version 3, recruitment into the lomvastomig arm has been stopped. The decision to stop recruitment for lomvastomig was based on strategic considerations and not based on emerging safety and/or efficacy data. The benefit/risk assessment for lomvastomig remains unchanged. The study was planned to enroll participants randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive lomvastomig, tobemstomig, or nivolumab. With version 3 of the protocol, recruitment into the lomvastomig arm has stopped, and moving forward, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tobemstomig or nivolumab.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
190
2100 milligrams (mg) administered by intravenous (IV) infusion once every 2 weeks on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle.
2100 mg administered by IV infusion once every 2 weeks on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle.
240 mg administered by IV infusion once every 2 weeks on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle.
Inst. Alexander Fleming
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro Oncologico Riojano Integral (CORI)
La Rioja, Argentina
Hospital das Clinicas - UFRGS
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo - ICESP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Masaryk?v onkologický ústav
Brno, Czechia
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate median OS. 80% confidence interval (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. IxRS=Interactive response system.
Time frame: From randomization to death (up to approximately 38.7 months)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: Up to approximately 27 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved an objective response (OR), characterized by a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. 80% CI for rates were constructed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38.7months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR was defined as ORR plus stable disease rate (SDR). ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved an OR, characterized by a CR or PR as per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. Stable disease (SD) was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. 80% CI for rates were constructed using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38.7 months
Duration of Response (DoR)
DoR for participants with ORR was defined as time from first occurrence of a documented OR to PD as per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved an OR, chaacterized by a CR or PR as per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median DOR. 80% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38.7 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined per RECIST v1.1, or death during the treatment period, or within 60 days of the last tumor assessment after treatment discontinuation from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. K-M method was used to estimate median PFS. 80% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38.7 months
Percentage of Participants Reporting Clinically Meaningful Improvement in GHS/QoL, Emotional and Social Functioning as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument consisting of 30 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, \& social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, \& pain), global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea \& financial difficulties). Functioning \& symptom items were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. The GHS/QoL questions were scored on a 7-point scale with scores ranging from 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. All EORTC scales \& single-item measures were linearly transformed to a score range of 0-100. High score for a functioning/GHS scale=high/healthy level of functioning/better HRQoL; however, high score for a symptom scale=high level of symptom severity. Clinically significant improvement=an increase of at least 10 points from baseline in GHS/QoL, emotional and social functioning.
Time frame: From baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reporting Clinically Meaningful Improvement in GHS/QoL, Emotional and Social Functioning, as Measured by the EORTC QLQ - Item Library 97 (IL97)
EORTC QLQ-IL97, a reduced version of the QLQ-C30, is a cancer-specific instrument consisting of 17 questions to evaluate two aspects of participant functioning (emotional and social), GHS/QoL, and six symptoms (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain, appetite loss, \& diarrhoea), with a recall period of the previous week. The scoring for the IL97 followed the same pattern as the QLQ-C30. Functioning \& symptom items were scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. The GHS/QoL questions were scored on a 7-point scale with scores ranging from 1=Very poor to 7=Excellent. Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0-100. High score for a functioning/GHS scale=high/healthy level of functioning/better HRQoL; however, high score for a symptom scale=high level of symptom severity. Clinically significant improvement=an increase of at least 10 points from baseline in GHS/QoL, emotional and social functioning.
Time frame: From baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reporting a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Dysphagia, as Measured by the EORTC QLQ for Oesophageal Cancer-18 (OES-18)
EORTC QLQ-OES18, a modular supplement to the EORTC QLQ-C30, is a cancer-specific instrument, consisting of 4 multiple-item scales (dysphagia, eating, reflux, and pain) and 6 single items (trouble swallowing saliva, choked when swallowing, dry mouth, trouble with taste, trouble with coughing, and trouble talking), with a recall period of the previous week. The scoring for the OES18 followed the same pattern as the QLQ-C30. Each symptom item was scored on a 4-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much. Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0-100, with a high score reflecting a high level of symptom severity. Clinically significant improvement=an increase of at least 10 points from baseline in GHS/QoL, emotional and social functioning.
Time frame: From baseline up to Week 12
Serum Concentration of Nivolumab
Time frame: 4 hours (h) pre-dose, and 1 & 5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1; pre-dose, and 0.5 & 4.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 & 5; 168 h post-dose on Day 8 of Cycles 1 & 5; pre-dose, and 0.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4 & 6 to 52 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Serum Concentration of Lomvastomig
Time frame: 4h pre-dose, and 1 & 5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1; pre-dose, and 0.5 & 4.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 & 5; 168 h post-dose on Day 8 of Cycles 1 & 5; pre-dose, and 0.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4 & 6 to 19 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Serum Concentration of Tobemstomig
Time frame: 4h pre-dose, and 1 & 5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1; pre-dose, and 0.5 & 4.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 2 & 5; 168 h post-dose on Day 8 of Cycles 1 & 5; pre-dose, and 0.5 h post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4 & 6 to 52 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Nivolumab
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Cmax of Lomvastomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Cmax of Tobemstomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Terminal Half-life (λz) of Nivolumab
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
λz of Lomvastomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
λz of Tobemstomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Area Under the Curve From Dosing to Last Concentration (AUClast) of Nivolumab
day\*µg/mL=days-micrograms per milliliter.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
AUClast of Lomvastomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
AUClast of Tobemstomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Estimate of the Volume of Distribution at Steady-state (Vss_obs) of Nivolumab
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Vss_obs of Lomvastomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Vss_obs of Tobemstomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Total Clearance (Cl_obs) of Nivolumab
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Cl_obs of Lomvastomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Cl_obs of Tobemstomig
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 5 (1 Cycle=14 days)
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Nivolumab
Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following nivolumab administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 0.60 titer unit (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Time frame: Up to approximately 24 months
Number of Participants With ADAs to Lomvastomig
Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following lomvastomig administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Time frame: Up to approximately 8.4 months
Number of Participants With ADAs to Tobemstomig
Participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative at baseline but developed an ADA response following tobemstomig administration (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was greater than the titer of the baseline sample by a scientifically reasonable margin such as at least 0.60 t.u. greater than the baseline titer result (treatment-enhanced ADA response).
Time frame: Up to approximately 24 months
Change From Baseline in the Phenotype and Activation Status (Cluster of Differentiation 4 [CD4] Human Leukocyte Antigen - DR Isotype-positive [HLA-DR+] Kiel 67-positive [Ki67+]) of T-cell Subsets in the Peripheral Blood
Biomarker analyses were performed on peripheral blood samples collected from participants and assessed by flow cytometry. Zeros are present when no valid samples for PD assessments were collected/available at the respective visits. As the number of participants in the lomvastomig arm was more limited, chances to observe zeros are higher in this arm vs the other arms.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51; Day 8 of Cycles 1 & 5; Study drug completion / Early discontinuation visit; (1 Cycle=14 days) (up to 24 months)
Change From Baseline in the Phenotype and Activation Status (Cluster of Differentiation 8 [CD8] HLA-DR+ Ki67+) of T-cell Subsets in the Peripheral Blood
Biomarker analyses were performed on peripheral blood samples collected from participants and assessed by flow cytometry. Zeros are present when no valid samples for PD assessments were collected/available at the respective visits. As the number of participants in the lomvastomig arm was more limited, chances to observe zeros are higher in this arm vs the other arms.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51; Day 8 of Cycles 1 & 5; Study drug completion / Early discontinuation visit; (1 Cycle=14 days) (up to 24 months)
Baseline CD8 T-cell Infiltration, Poliferation (Cluster of Differentiation 8-positive Subunit Alpha [CD8A+] Ki67+) Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment
CD8 T-cell infiltration, poliferation (CD8A+ Ki67+) expression in the tumor microenvironment at baseline, was assessed from previously collected tumour samples (archival samples). For participants without an available archival tumor sample, a fresh tumor sample was collected during the screening. Both archival and screening samples were considered baseline samples to assess biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment.
Time frame: At baseline
Baseline Anti-programmed Death-1 (PDL1) Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment
Anti-PDL1 expression in the tumor microenvironment at baseline, was assessed from previously collected tumour samples (archival samples). For participants without an available archival tumor sample, a fresh tumor sample was collected during the screening. Both archival and screening samples were considered as baseline samples to assess biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment.
Time frame: At baseline
Baseline CD8A+ Anti-programmed Death-1-positive (PD1+) Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment
CD8A+ Anti-PD1+ expression in the tumor microenvironment at baseline, was assessed from previously collected tumour samples (archival samples). For participants without an available archival tumor sample, a fresh tumor sample was collected during the screening. Both archival and screening samples were considered as baseline samples to assess biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment.
Time frame: At Baseline
Baseline CD8A+ T-cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin Domain 3-positive (TIM3+) Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment
CD8A+ TIM3+ expression in the tumor microenvironment at baseline, was assessed from previously collected tumour samples (archival samples). For participants without an available archival tumor sample, a fresh tumor sample was collected during the screening. Both archival and screening samples were considered as baseline samples to assess biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment.
Time frame: At Baseline
Baseline CD8A+ Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3-positive (LAG3+) Expression in the Tumor Microenvironment
CD8A+ LAG3+ expression in the tumor microenvironment at baseline, was assessed from previously collected tumour samples (archival samples). For participants without an available archival tumor sample, a fresh tumor sample was collected during the screening. Both archival and screening samples were considered as baseline samples to assess biomarkers within the tumor microenvironment.
Time frame: At Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, Czechia
Rigshospitalet
København Ø, Denmark
Odense Universitetshospital, Onkologisk Afdeling R
Odense C, Denmark
Hopital Claude Huriez
Lille, France
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, France
...and 42 more locations