This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Halsted's apprenticeship approach to training with the PBP approach for teaching the robotic suturing of a VUA on a chicken model.
In a prospective, randomized and blinded study robotic naïve (urology (n = 12), surgery (n = 12) and gynecology (n = 12)) residents (n = 36) from the KU Leuven and University of Gent residency training programs will be randomized (in equal discipline numbers) to Traditional Halstedian apprenticeship type training or proficiency based progression (PBP) training to learn to perform a vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) on a chicken model. Both groups will receive the same e-learning (on how to perform the VUA on the chicken model) and skills laboratory robotic training curriculum. The PBP trained group will however be required to demonstrate quantitively defined proficiency benchmarks for training progression (i.e., from e-learning to the skills lab). The PBP group will also have a defined benchmark to demonstrate before training is deemed completed. The Traditional trained group will train in the same skills laboratory for a case-matched period of time as the PBP group, with the same level of supervising faculty proctors and using the same training resources but with no proficiency benchmarks or metric-based feedback. Both groups will be required to perform a VUA on the chicken model before skills training proper and at the end of training. Investigators will be trained in pairs to assess VUA performance from a pre-defined set of explicitly defined binary metric events reliably (inter-rater reliability \> 0.8). They will also be blinded as to the identity of the trainee performing the procedure, how they were trained (i.e., group) and procedure order. H1 It is hypothesized that implementation of PBP training in teaching the robotic suturing of VUA leads to better surgical training outcomes (i.e., lower number of performance errors) when compared to Halsted's method.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
36
Performance of a vesico urethral anastomosis on a chicken model with Da Vinci robotic system
Orsi Academy
Melle, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Surgical proficiency level determined by objectively assessed, validated, binary performance operative metrics. Comparison between PBP training versus traditional training for a robotic suturing and knot tying task.
The aim of this paper is to report the main outcomes of the PROVESA trial without emphasizing the interspecialty differences. The investigators will however emphasize its methodology, the fact that is well controlled and multicentric. Differences in proficiency level, assessed by binary performance metrics based assessment of a robotic suturing and knot tying task, will be reported.
Time frame: 1 year
Cross-specialty differences in surgical proficiency levels, assessed by objectively assessed, validated, binary performance operative metrics, for a robotic suturing and knot tying task.
Surgical skill is often thought to be associated to surgical discipline. The aim of this study is to compare the objectively assessed training outcomes of different surgical disciplines (Surgery, Gynecology/obstetrics and Urology) performing the robotic suturing of a vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) on a chicken model. Participants were trained according to a traditional versus a proficiency based progression methodology and were assessed by the use of validated, binary performance operative metrics.
Time frame: 1 year
Difference in interrater reliability for metrics-based scoring determined by objectively assessed, validated, binary performance operative metrics versus GEARS-based scoring of a robotic suturing and knot tying task.
Nowadays, different methods are used to assess surgical performance. One of the most commonly used methods is the GEARS (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills). This is, however, a qualitative scoring method which uses a Likert scale for scoring and which might be prone to poor interrater reliability and subjectiveness. The aim of this paper will be to report the interrater reliability of both scoring methods and the correlation between each other. Hypothesis is that interrater reliability will be superior for performance metrics. The investigators will try to answer the question which is the best tool to assess surgical performance.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 2 years
Trainee's satisfaction as assessed by questionnaire with Likert scale. Does it influence outcome of surgical training? Comparison between proficiency based progression training versus traditional training for a robotic suturing and knot tying task.
Satisfaction of a surgical trainee is often thought to be key for training quality and a predictor of good outcome of surgical training. At the end of the PROVESA, all participants were asked to complete an online questionnaire where their satisfaction with the adopted training method was asked for using a Likert scale. Hypothesis is that trainee's satisfaction does NOT correlate with training outcome and that satisfaction is NOT a good determinator of training quality.
Time frame: 2 years
Correlation between live and video-based scoring of surgical performance
Surgical performance is often assessed live during surgery. However, one might miss specific details of performance. A possible answer to this query lies in video-based scoring of a surgical task. However, does video-based scoring reflects the same surgical quality? Moreover, one could question the ethical aspect of non-live scoring of surgical performance. In the PROVESA trial, all surgical tasks were scored live and video-based afterwards. The correlation in metrics-based performance scores between live and video-based assessment will be investigated. Hypothesis is that there will be no differences. The investigators will try to answer the question which scoring method will give the trainee the highest chance of reaching proficiency?
Time frame: 2 years
Reporting the outcome of the e-learning scores from an online proficiency questionnaire on an online learning platform. Comparison between proficiency based progression training versus traditional training for a robotic suturing and knot tying task.
During the PROVESA trial, all participants had to do an online assessment. This was done on an online learning platform using a questionnaire. A proficiency benchmark was set based on the mean score of experts on the same questionnaire. The PBP group needed to do this after doing an online curriculum during which the operative metrics were explained. In order to move forward to the clinical training in the lab, they had to show proficiency on the test by reaching a pre-defined benchmark. The Control group needed to do the online assessment after their day of training and after performing the final VUA. The investigators noted a significant correlation between the score on the online assessment and the number of metrics-based performance errors. The lower the score on the online test, the more performance errors they made. The aim of this paper will be to stipulate the importance of e-learning and online scoring and its correlation with surgical performance.
Time frame: 2 years