Evaluation of TAVR using the NAVITOR valve in a Global Investigation.
The VANTAGE clinical trial will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at intermediate or low risk of surgical mortality. This trial will also evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in a valve-in-valve application.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
434
Navitor valve is indicated for transcatheter delivery in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who are intermediate or low surgical risk. Subjects will undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Navitor valve and FlexNav Delivery system.
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Leak (PVL)
The primary effectiveness endpoint is moderate or greater paravalvular leak (PVL) at 30 days, as assessed by the echocardiographic core laboratory. The hypothesis test was performed based on the implanted population in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 30 days.
Time frame: at 30 Days
Primary Safety Endpoint: The Rates of All-cause Mortality or Fatal Stroke/Stroke With Disability
The composite of rate of all-cause mortality or fatal stroke/stroke with disability at 12 months post index Navitor implantation procedure as adjudicated by the CEC per Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definitions calculated against the performance goal of 11.3%.
Time frame: at 12 months
Mean Change in Mean Transvalvular Gradient
This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in mean transvalvular gradient from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of -10mmHg.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Mean Change in Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in effective orifice area (EOA) from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 0.4 cm².
Time frame: Baseline to12 months
Mean Change In KCCQ Quality Of Life Score
This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life (QoL) score from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 5 points. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better symptoms and physical functioning. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a tool of heart failure-specific health status questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst and 100 represents the best quality of life. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and lower symptoms. The mean change from baseline reflects the average improvement (positive values) or worsening (negative values) in patient-reported health status.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Murdoch, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Woolloongabba, Australia
St. Andrew's Hospital
Adelaide, Australia
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Australia
Macquirie University Hopsital
Ryde, Australia
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH
Linz, Austria
AKH Wien
Vienna, Austria
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
CHU Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, France
...and 27 more locations
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months