Adolescence is a time of heightened reward sensitivity and greater impulsivity. On top of this, many teenagers experience chronic sleep deprivation and misalignment of their circadian rhythms due to biological shifts in their sleep/wake patterns paired with early school start times. Many studies find that this increases the risk for substance use (SU). However, what impact circadian rhythm and sleep disruption either together or independently have on the neuronal circuitry that controls reward and cognition, or if there are interventions that might help to modify these disruptions is unknown. Project 2 (P2) of the CARRS center will test an innovative and mechanistic model of brain circuitry that uses multi-method approaches, takes a developmental perspective, and incorporates key sleep and reward constructs.
Substance use (SU) and substance use disorders (SUD) pose devastating health, financial, and societal costs. The incidence of SU and SUDs increases across adolescence, making this sensitive developmental period one of both heightened risk-and heightened opportunity for prevention and intervention. However, to develop effective interventions investigators need to identify novel and modifiable risk factors and mechanisms for SUD. Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances are such risk factors, and the reward system, with its increasing sensitivity during adolescence, provides a plausible mechanistic substrate. The focus on sleep, circadian rhythms, and reward system function is particularly salient given the extensive, parallel development of these systems during adolescence, and the plausible linkages between sleep and circadian rhythms, reward function, and SUD risk. Late sleep timing, short sleep duration and circadian misalignment are associated with increased substance use in teenagers and young adults. The central hypothesis of the Center for Adolescent Reward, Rhythms and Sleep (CARRS) is that adolescent development acts on underlying sleep and circadian traits to modify homeostatic sleep drive, circadian phase, and circadian alignment, which in turn impact cortico-limbic functions critical to SU risk (e.g., reward and cognitive control). Investigators further hypothesize that specific manipulations of sleep and circadian rhythms during adolescence will affect reward responsivity and cognitive control in either positive or negative directions. These manipulations will provide experimental support for our model, and proof of concept for novel clinical interventions to reduce the risk of SU and SUDs. Most previous studies have examined individual components of circadian rhythms, sleep, and reward function in adolescence. Project 2 (P2) of CARRS will test an innovative and mechanistic model of brain circuitry that uses multi-method approaches, takes a developmental perspective, and incorporates key sleep and reward constructs. Most notably, P2 improves upon past observational work by testing an experimental intervention that manipulates sleep and circadian rhythms to directly examine its impact on reward function and cognitive control. P2 will study 150 adolescents (age 13-15, 50% female) across two key sleep phenotypes: early sleep timing (low risk, n=50) and late sleep timing (high risk, n=100). All participants will complete the observational study: 2 weeks of home sleep monitoring (actigraphy \& sleep diary), followed by an overnight laboratory visit to assess self-report, behavioral, and neuroimaging (fMRI) tasks tapping cognitive control and reward function, as well as circadian phase via salivary melatonin and molecular rhythms via hair follicles. The Late group will continue to the experimental study, each participant randomized to manipulation or attentional control conditions (n=50 each). Investigators will probe whether advancing sleep/circadian timing and extending sleep duration via sleep scheduling and chronotherapeutic approaches (reducing PM light exposure; administering AM bright light) improves sleep, circadian, and neurobehavioral function relevant to SUD risk. Finally, repeated 6-month follow-up assessments of sleep and SU for all participants are included to examine longitudinal associations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Participants will wear Re-Timer bright glasses for 30 minutes each morning upon rising
Participants will wear tinted glasses that block blue wavelength light for 2 hours before bed
Participants will advance their bedtime by 1.5 hours and regularize their wake time
Participants will complete smartphone-based sleep, mood, and substance use monitoring
Western Psychiatric Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGWeekday Sleep Duration--Actigraphy & Diaries
Total Sleep Time as determined by wrist actigraphy data \& sleep diaries (averaged across weekdays during 2 weeks at T1 and 2 weeks at T2)
Time frame: Baseline (2 Weeks), T2 (2 weeks)
Circadian Timing-Dim Light Melatonin Onset
Circadian Timing as determined by dim light melatonin onset during saliva sampling using the 4pg/ml threshold.
Time frame: Baseline Overnight Visit (T1) & T2 Overnight Visit(2 weeks later). Always on a Friday.
Circadian Alignment
Circadian alignment is operationalized as the interval between the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and sleep midpoint based on the prior two nights of actigraphy data.
Time frame: Baseline overnight (T1), T2 overnight (2 weeks after T1)
Reward motivation (Behavioral)
Assessed by adjusted average pumps on Balloon Analogue Risk Task, a computerized measure of risk taking behavior in which participants are presented with a series of balloons and offered the chance to earn money by pumping each balloon up by clicking a button. The adjusted average only includes non-burst trials.
Time frame: Baseline overnight (T1) vs. T2 overnight (2 weeks after T1)
Behavioral Inhibition
Accuracy on Cued Go/No-Go Task, specifically correct response (withholding response) on No-Go trials following an incongruent Go cue
Time frame: Baseline overnight (T1) vs. T2 overnight (2 weeks after T1). Always on a Friday.
Neural correlates of Impulse control
Activation within the Executive Control Network during the Stop Signal Task, a computerized an fMRI behavioral task. Specifically, activation is defined as bold signal in regions of the Executive Control Network on unsuccessful Stop trials versus successful Go trials. Higher values represent increased activity to unsuccessful Stop versus successful Go trials.
Time frame: Baseline overnight (T1) vs. T2 overnight (2 weeks after T1). Always on a Friday.
Neural correlates of Reward Anticipation
Activation within the reward network during the Monetary Incentive Delay task, a computerized an fMRI behavioral task. Specifially, activation is defined as bold signal in regions of the reward network (from NeuroSynth), on reward anticipation trials (large reward) versus neutral (no money) trials. Higher values represent increased reactivity to reward, as compared to neutral trials.
Time frame: Baseline overnight (T1) vs. T2 overnight (2 weeks after T1). Always on a Friday.
Neural Correlates of Reward Receipt
Monetary Incentive Delay Task: Win Outcome vs No Win contrast within the reward network (from Neurosynth). Higher values represent increased reactivity to reward wins, as compared to neutral trials.
Time frame: Overnight visits at end of T1 & T2 (two weeks after T1)
Cannabis use
Days of cannabis use on Timeline Follow Back interview administered during the baseline interview and in self-report surveys every 6 months.
Time frame: Continuously every 6 months for up to 5 years
Alcohol Use
Days of alcohol use on Timeline Follow Back interview administered during baseline interview and every six months via self-report
Time frame: Continuously every 6 months for up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.