Reparixin in COVID-19 Pneumonia - Efficacy and Safety

Phase 3TerminatedNCT04794803

Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A56 enrolled

Overview

* Phase 2 Study Objectives: efficacy and safety of of Reparixin treatment as compared to the control arm in adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia * Phase 3 Study Objectives: efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment as compared to the control arm in adult patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia

This clinical trial is an adaptive phase 2/3, randomized, controlled multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of Reparixin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. 48 patients are planned to be enrolled in Phase 2 and an estimated total of 111 patients are planned to be enrolled up to the end of Phase 3, with a randomization 2:1 Reparixin vs Control (Standard of care). In the phase 2 segment of this study, patients are randomized 2:1 to Reparixin oral tablets 1200 mg (Group 1, active treatment) or standard of care (Group 2, control arm). In case of worsening (e.g. need of ICU and/or mechanical ventilation) after the first 24hrs, patients are offered a rescue medication with no restriction from the sponsor and fully based on their physicians' judgement. In the phase 3 segment of this study, it is planned that patients are randomized 2:1 to Reparixin or standard of care. The Phase 3 design will be reassessed and decided based on the results of the Phase 2.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Severe Pneumonia

Interventions

ReparixinDRUG

Reparixin was administered via oral tablets 1200 mg TID for 7 days. In case of improvement, treatment can be prolonged at discretion of the investigator up to a maximum of 21 days of treatment in total or live discharge from the hospital, whichever comes first.

Standard of careDRUG

Standard of care

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 90 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Phase 2 Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 to 90. 2. Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis 3. At least one of the following: # Respiratory distress, RR ≥ 30 breaths/min without oxygen; # Partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) / Fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2) \>100 \<300mmHg (1mmHg = 0.133kPa). 4. Chest imaging confirms lung involvement and inflammation. 5. Inflammatory status as documented by at least one of the following: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) \> normal range, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 100mg/L or IL-6 ≥ 40pg/mL, serum ferritin ≥ 900ng/mL, XDP \>20mcg/mL. * Phase 3 Inclusion Criteria: Same as above; other criteria TBD based on Phase 2 outcomes. Exclusion Criteria: • Phase 2/3 Exclusion Criteria: 1. Cannot obtain informed consent. 2. Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child Pugh score ≥ C, or AST\> 5 times the upper limit); Severe renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30mL / min / 1.73 m2) or receive continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis. 3. Patients with hypersensitivity to ibuprofen or to more than one non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or to more than one medication belonging to the class of sulfonamides (e.g. sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib; hypersensitivity to sulphanilamide antibiotics alone, e.g. sulfamethoxazole, does not qualify for exclusion) 4. Severe, active bleeding such as hemoptysis, gastrointestinal bleeding, central nervous system bleeding, and nosebleeds within 1 month before enrollment. 5. Pregnant and lactating women and those planning to get pregnant. 6. Participated in other interventional clinical trials with investigational medicinal products, not considered suitable for this study by the researchers. 7. At the time of enrollment, patients not in a clinical condition compatible with the oral administration of the study drug.

Locations (4)

Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo

São Paulo, Brazil

Ospedale San Paolo

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Ospedale San Raffaele

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Ospedale di Varese

Varese, Lombardy, Italy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Phase 2 - Percentage of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Clinical Events

Composite event is defined as the onset of at least one of the following events: * supplemental oxygen requirement based on a worsening of PaO2/FiO2 ratio, * invasive mechanical ventilation use, * admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), * use of a rescue medication for any reason. Please note that in the measure type "number" actually is a "rate" of patients. Rate is referred to a binomial response rate while the 95% CIs are estimated by using the Clopper-Pearson's method

Time frame: Up to Day 1

Secondary Outcomes

Phase 2 - Percentage of Patients With Improvement in Clinical Severity Score (as Recommended by WHO for COVID Studies) of at Least Two Points

Changes in clinical severity score are defined as the time to clinical improvement of two points from the time of randomization on a seven-category ordinal scale or live discharge from the hospital, whichever came first. The seven-category ordinal scale consisted of the following: 1) not hospitalized, with resumption of normal activities; 2) not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities; 3) hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4) hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) hospitalized, requiring high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 6) hospitalized, requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; and 7) death. The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A subject is considered "improved" with a clinical severity score improvement of at least two points compared to randomization or live discharge from the hospital. n are the subjects improved at each time point vs baseline.

Time frame: At day 1, day 2, week 1, day 21(end of treatment, EOT), EOS (end of study, i.e. 7±3 days after EOT)

Phase 2 - Percentage of Improved Subjects in Dyspnea Severity, Assessed by Liker Scale

The severity of dyspnea can be measured through the Liker scale. The Liker scale is used as follows: the patient grades his current breathing compared to when he first started the drug (from -3 to 3). "0" = no change, "1" =minimally better, "2" =moderately better, "3" =markedly better, "-1" =minimally worse, "-2" =moderately worse, "-3" =markedly worse. The higher the score, the better the outcome. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the dyspnea severity scale at each time point is available. n is the number of subjects improved at each time point in comparison with the randomization.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 2, week 1, day 21(end of treatment, EOT), 7±3 days after treatment period (end of study, EOS)

Phase 2 - Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Severity, Assessed by VAS Scale

The severity of dyspnea is measured also through the VAS scale. The VAS scale is used as follows: the patient draws a horizontal line on an axial graph (from 0 to 100) to show the degree of how he feels about breathing. The number "0" equals the worst breathing the patient has ever felt and the number "100" equals the best he has ever felt. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the dyspnea severity scale at each time point is available. n is the number of subjects improved at each time point in comparison with the randomization.

Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 2, week 1, day 21(end of treatment, EOT), 7±3 days after treatment period (end of study, EOS)

Changes From Baseline in Body Temperature to Any Post-baseline Timepoints

Variations in the mean body temperature from baseline to any post-baseline timepoint were assessed. n is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the body temperature at each time point is available.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Week 1, EOT and EOS

Phase 2 - Percentage of Subjects Worsened, During Supplemental Oxygen Treatment, From Randomization According to PaO2/FiO2

Cumulative quantity of oxygen treatment (L) = Sum of all Quantity (L) in CONCOMITANT OXYGEN TREATMENT form, from randomization to time point of interest. According to PaO2/FiO2, the classification is 'mild' if 200 \<= PaO2/FiO2 \< 300 mmHg, 'moderate' if 100 \<= PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mmHg, 'severe' if PaO2/FiO2 \< 100 mmHg. A patient with ARDS (PaO2/FiO2\<300 mmHg) is considered 'worsened' in case of a decrease of PaO2/FiO2 of at least one third (-33,3%) from the baseline PaO2/FiO2 value. NOTE that: N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at each time point is available. While n is the number of subjects worsened at each time point in comparison with the randomization, expressed in percentage.

Time frame: At day 1, day 2, week 1, day 21(end of treatment), follow-up (FU) (7±3 days after treatment period)

Phase 2 - Percentage of Subjects Worsened, During Supplemental Oxygen Treatment, From Randomization According to Oxygen Delivery System Classification

Duration of oxygen administration (hours) = Administration end date/time - Administration start date/time / 60. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the Oxygen Delivery System Classification at each time point is available. n is the number of subjects worsened at each time point, expressed in percentage, in comparison with the randomization. According to Oxygen Delivery System, the classification is 'invasive' if there is Invasive Medicinal Ventilation or ECMO, else 'high flow' if there is High Flow Nasal Cannula or BIPAP or CPAP, else 'low flow' if there is Nasal Cannula or Mask then Class=Low Flow Classification. A patient is considered 'Worsened' after baseline if there is an increase in the level of severity within the oxygen delivery system classification (Invasive \> High Flow \> Low Flow).

Time frame: day 1, day 2, week 1, day 21(end of treatment), follow-up (FU) (7±3 days after treatment period)

Phase 2 - Oxygen Cumulative Duration During the Study

This outcome assesses the oxygen cumulative duration during the study. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio or Oxygen Delivery System Classification at each time point is available. n is the number of subjects worsened at each time point in comparison with the randomization.

Time frame: Week 1, EOT, EOS

Phase 2 - Oxygen Cumulative Quantity During the Study

In this endpoint is assessed the oxygen cumulative quantity needed at each single timepoint. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio or Oxygen Delivery System Classification at each time point is available. n is the number of subjects worsened at each time point in comparison with the randomization.

Time frame: Week 1, EOT and EOS

Phase 2 - Percentage of Subjects Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Use, Overall

Percentage along with the 95% confidence interval (Clopper-Pearson's formula) of subjects requiring mechanical ventilation are calculated and compared. N is the number of subjects for which the evaluation of the use of mechanical ventilation is available. n is the number, expressed in percentage, of subjects requiring mechanical ventilation, overall.