The aim of the present study is to evaluate the wear of enamel opposed by Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia compared to that of enamel opposed by Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the wear of enamel opposed by Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia compared to that of enamel opposed by Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia Teeth preparation and impressions, placement and permanent cementation of the final restoration using resin cement, and optical scanning of both the restoration and the opposing tooth. Follow up postoperatively after six and twelve months, and optical scanning of both the restoration and the opposing tooth.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
26
Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Newly Introduced Gradient Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear
Fabrication of full-coverage crowns over posterior teeth using Full Strength Monolithic Zirconia to measure wear
Enamel wear of teeth opposing the restorations to be tested opposing to tested restorations
measured by Geomagic professional software
Time frame: one year
Wear of restorations to tested opposed to natural teeth
measured by Geomagic professional software
Time frame: one year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.