Comparison of 2 Ventilatory Support Strategies During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pneumonia

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer133 enrolled

Overview

This retrospective monocentric study compares 2 ventilatory support strategies on outcomes (length of stay, intubation, mortality) in patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit with Covid-19 related pneumonia : invasive strategy used during the first period and non-invasive strategies (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High Flow Nasal Canula, Prone Position) used during the second period.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

133

Conditions

COVID-19

Interventions

Invasive ventilation strategyPROCEDURE

Use of an invasive ventilatory support strategy

Non-invasive ventilation strategiesPROCEDURE

Use of non-invasive ventilatory support strategies

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient with confirmed SARS COV2 infection * Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome * Patient more than 18 year old Exclusion Criteria: * Intensive Care Unit admission for extra pulmonary failure * "Do Not Reanimated" order * Patient from another Intensive Care Unit * Patient objection * Judicial protection

Locations (1)

Hôpital Sainte Musse

Toulon, Var, France

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Length of stay in ICU

Number of days spent in ICU

Time frame: At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month

Secondary Outcomes

Mortality

Rate of patients alive at the moment of intensive care unit discharge

Time frame: At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month

Complications

Number of complications during intensive care unit stay

Time frame: At the moment of ICU discharge or death, up to 3 month

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.