The recent ARRIVE trial conducted in United States of America in 2014-2017 demonstrates that elective induction of labor at 39 weeks for nulliparous women did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery with no significant differences of adverse perinatal outcomes. But the expected benefits of elective labor induction at 39 weeks have to be confirmed in other settings outside US before considering routine induction of labor for all low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks of gestation worldwide.
The nadir of the neonatal risks seems to be at 39 weeks of gestation and there is an augmentation of maternal complications after 39 weeks. Nonetheless, planned induction of labor at 39 weeks was not encouraged in common practice due to a suspected higher risk of frequency cesarean delivery and other adverse maternal outcomes, especially among nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix, compared with expectant management. This suspected increased maternal morbidity especially the cesarean rate associated with the induction of labor was based on observational studies which suffer from methodological limitations or based on underpowered small randomized clinical trials. A recent multicenter, randomized, controlled, unmasked trial conducted in United States of America in 2014-2017 (ARRIVE trial), provides new results with a high level of evidence. This trial conducted among 6,106 low-risk nulliparous women who were randomized, 3062 assigned to labor induction at 39 weeks 0 day to 39 weeks 4 days and 3,044 assigned to expectant management, demonstrates that induction of labor at 39 weeks did result in a trend but not significant lower frequency of the primary outcome - a composite adverse perinatal outcome - (relative risk \[RR\] 0.80, 95% confidence interval \[CI\] 0.64-1.00), but did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93). Although the cesarean delivery rate was a secondary outcome of the study and the absence of any comparison for women's characteristics of those who were eligible and declined to participate and those who were randomized, the recommendations of the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and numerous authors have already considered that induction of labor ≥ 39 weeks should be proposed in low-risk nulliparous women. In other words, on the basis mainly on the results of a secondary outcome from only one single randomized controlled trial, they have proposed to modify the management of the pregnant women who reach 39 weeks gestation (i.e. the large majority of the pregnant women) while until now induction of labor for those women was proposed only if abnormal medical condition occurred or beyond 41 weeks of gestation. Nevertheless, the findings of the ARRIVE trial are so important because the reduction of the cesarean rate is a worldwide goal and the elective induction of labor ≥ 39 weeks seems to be today the most effective way to achieve it. However, French context and obstetrical practices are different than USA, with a lower rate of cesarean. Women's characteristics are also different (i.e. lower body mass index in France). Consequently, the external validity of the ARRIVE trial needs to be confirmed. Moreover, in the ARRIVE trial, the labor management has to respect American recent guidelines with a longer duration of the latent phase and administration of oxytocin if needed for at least 12 hours after membrane rupture before deeming the induction a failure. A generalization of labor induction at 39 weeks without a strictly respect of the eligibility criteria or labor management could result to an increase of unexpected adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Thus, the expected benefits of labor induction at 39 weeks have to be confirmed in other context, in particular in French settings with a lower cesarean rate than in USA by replicating the ARRIVE study conducting another randomized controlled trial for which the primary outcome will be the cesarean section rate. This replication is crucial before leading to a such important change in daily practice that would be considering routine induction of labor for low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks of gestation and consequently modifying the organization of all maternity wards in order to achieve this policy. In addition to the replication of the ARRIVE trial in a French context, a prospective observational cohort with 4,200 women is associated with this trial to identify a potential participant selection bias.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4,200
Elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
RECRUITINGIncidence of cesarean section
Incidence of cesarean section defined as a cesarean birth regardless of the indication from the time the woman is randomized
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of incisional extensions
Incidence of incisional extensions at cesarean section or cervical traumas
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of operative vaginal delivery
Incidence of operative vaginal delivery and indication
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of operative vaginal delivery for cesarean
Incidence of operative delivery defined by a cesarean delivery or an instrumental vaginal delivery
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of third or fourth degree perineal laceration
Incidence of third or fourth degree perineal laceration
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of chorioamnionitis
Incidence of chorioamnionitis, defined as a clinical diagnosis before delivery as: maternal fever (body temperature ≥ 38°C) with no alternative cause identified and at least one sign among the following: fetal tachycardia\>160 bpm for ≥ 10min or purulent amniotic fluid from the cervical canal
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage
Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage defined similarly as Grobman et al. in ARRIVE trial as any of the following: * Transfusion * Non-elective hysterectomy * Use of sulprostone * Other surgical interventions such as uterine compression sutures, uterine artery ligation, embolization and hypogastric ligation, balloon tamponade * Curettage
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of admission to intensive care unit
Incidence of admission to intensive care unit
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of maternal death
Incidence of maternal death
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension
Incidence of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Maternal pain
Median patient-reported pain outcomes with a 10-point Likert scale
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Maternal satisfaction
Maternal satisfaction with a satisfaction questionnaire derived from the childbirth experience questionnaire and satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
interval from randomization to delivery
Median interval from randomization to delivery
Time frame: Day 1
gestational age at delivery
Median gestational age at delivery
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of maternal postpartum infection
Incidence of maternal postpartum infection defined similarly as Grobman et al. in ARRIVE trial as any of the following: * Clinical diagnosis of endometritis * Wound reopened for hematoma, seroma, infection or other reasons * Cellulitis requiring antibiotics * Pneumonia * Pyelonephritis * Bacteremia unknown source * Septic pelvic thrombosis
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of maternal venous thromboembolism
Incidence of maternal venous thromboembolism (deep venous thrombosis diagnosed using bilateral leg Doppler ultrasound or pulmonary embolism diagnosed using bilateral ventilation-perfusion lung scanning or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography)
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Cervical ripening and induction
Method used for cervical ripening and induction
Time frame: Day 1-2
Incidence of composite of severe neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality
Incidence of composite of severe neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality (any one of the following): * Antepartum, intrapartum, or neonatal death * Intubation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ventilation or cardiorespiratory support within first 72 hours * Apgar ≤ 3 at 5 minutes * Neonatal encephalopathy * Seizures * Sepsis (presence of a clinically ill infant in whom systemic infection is suspected with a positive blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), or catheterized/suprapubic urine culture; or, in the absence of positive cultures, clinical evidence of cardiovascular collapse or an unequivocal X-ray confirming infection). * Pneumonia confirmed by X-ray or positive blood culture. * Meconium aspiration syndrome * Birth trauma (bone fractures, brachial plexus palsy, other neurologic injury, retinal hemorrhage, facial nerve injury) * Intracranial hemorrhage or subgaleal hemorrhage * Hypotension requiring pressor support
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Mean birth weight
Mean birth weight, incidence of macrosomia \> 4,000 g, incidence of large for date fetuses defined as \> 90th percentile weight for gestational age
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of neonatal acidosis
Incidence of neonatal acidosis (defined by umbilical cord arterial pH \< 7.00)
Time frame: Day 1
Median duration of respiratory support
Median duration of respiratory support including ventilator, CPAP, HFNC
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of small for gestational age
Incidence of small for gestational age defined as \< 5th and \< 10th percentile weight for gestational age
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of cephalohematoma
Incidence of cephalohematoma
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of shoulder dystocia
Incidence of shoulder dystocia
Time frame: Day 1
Incidence of neonatal transfusion
Incidence of neonatal transfusion of blood products or blood
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of hyperbilirubinemia
Incidence of hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy or exchange transfusion
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of hypoglycemia
Incidence of hypoglycemia (glucose \< 35 mg/L) requiring IV therapy
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of admission to neonatal intensive care unit
Incidence of admission to neonatal intensive care unit or intermediate care unit
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Incidence of epidural use
outcomes: Incidence of epidural use
Time frame: Day 1
Median hours on the labor and delivery unit
Median hours on the labor and delivery unit
Time frame: Day 1-2
Median maternal postpartum length of hospital stay
Median maternal postpartum length of hospital stay
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
Median neonatal length of hospital stay
Median neonatal length of hospital stay
Time frame: Hospital discharge (Day 3-5)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.