Limitation of donor site and significant postoperative morbidity are often described in connective tissue graft. We want to show if mucogain matrix used in tunnel technique to recover RTI Cairo recessions defects could be an alternative to connective tissue graft
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
8
Patients will have a surgery for their gingival recessions. They will be enrolled in the split mouth-study. They will have on one side mucogain matrix transplant, an on another side they will have the gold standard procedure
CHU de Nice
Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France
Mean root coverage obtained with both techniques
To compare the mean root coverage obtained with the Creos® Mucogain matrix and connective tissue graft in the treatment of Cairo RT1 class maxillary recessions (Miller Class 1).
Time frame: 6 months
Postoperative pain with both techniques
To compare postoperative pain with both techniques
Time frame: 6 months
Postoperative complications with both techniques
To compare the occurrence of postoperative complications (haemorrhage, edema) within the first 10 days.
Time frame: 10 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.