The proposed study evaluates the effect of carbon fiber brace design on forces across the ankle joint. It is expected that carbon fiber braces can be designed to reduce forces in the ankle. In this study, brace geometry will be varied to determine how these changes influence the forces experienced by ankle cartilage. The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses.
The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses. Healthy adult participants will complete testing using three generic sized carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) and with no CDO. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A, CDO-B, or CDO-C. Testing will be completed under 4 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C, with each bracing condition (A/B/C) representing a CDO design variant. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that changes to device design do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without CDO use, satisfaction with the devices, perception of comfort and smoothness between devices, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using surface electromyography. Devices will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded. The information obtained from this study will help refine the musculoskeletal model data input methods to be used in future studies. The knowledge that will be gained from this investigation has the potential to substantially improve the long-term efficacy and efficiency of the musculoskeletal model and help improve ankle foot orthosis
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
9
The CDO will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Joint Contact Stress-Time Exposure
Joint contact stress-time exposure (MPA-s/gait cycle) will be estimated using a participant specific musculoskeletal model. The model included surface geometry of each participants tibia and talus. Contact stress -time exposure, measured in MPa-s, was calculated at 13 points across the gait cycle. Higher values indicate greater contact stress-time exposure.
Time frame: Baseline
Ankle Range of Motion
Peak dorsiflexion angle (degrees) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Ankle Moment
Peak ankle moment (Nm/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Ankle Power
Peak ankle power (W/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar Force (Total Foot)
Force data (N) collected across the total foot measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar Force (Forefoot)
Force data (N) collected across the forefoot (distal 40% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar Force (Midfoot)
Force data (N) collected across the midfoot (middle 30% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar Force (Hindfoot)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Force data (N) collected across the hindfoot (proximal 30% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Four Square Step Test (4SST)
The 4SST (s) is a standardized timed test of balance and agility.
Time frame: Baseline
Sit to Stand 5 Times (STS5)
STS5 (s) is a well-established timed measure of lower limb muscle strength and power. Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down 5 times as fast as possible.
Time frame: Baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline
The Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS)
Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score. The survey asks users to indicate how much they agree with each statement on a scale from - Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (0) with a Don't Know/Not Applicable option. The average score across all questions was calculated and reported, larger scores indicate a better outcome associated with that device. The maximum possible score is a 5 and the minimum possible score is a 0.
Time frame: Baseline
Soleus Muscle Force (N)
Peak Soleus muscle forces (N) will be estimated using an Opensim model
Time frame: Baseline
Gastrocnemius Muscle Force (N)
Peak Gastrocnemius muscle forces (N) will be estimated using an OpenSim model
Time frame: Baseline
Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort)
Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.
Time frame: Baseline
Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness)
Comfort scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.
Time frame: Baseline