This phase III trial compares the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery to standard of care memantine and whole brain radiation therapy that avoids the hippocampus (the memory zone of the brain) for the treatment of small cell lung cancer that has spread to the brain. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a specialized radiation therapy that delivers a single, high dose of radiation directly to the tumor and may cause less damage to normal tissue. Whole brain radiation therapy delivers a low dose of radiation to the entire brain including the normal brain tissue. Hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) decreases the amount of radiation that is delivered to the hippocampus which is a brain structure that is important for memory. The drug, memantine, is also often given with whole brain radiotherapy because it may decrease the risk of side effects related to thinking and memory. Stereotactic radiosurgery may decrease side effects related to memory and thinking compared to standard of care HA-WBRT plus memantine.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Determine whether stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relative to whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance (HA-WBRT) plus memantine hydrochloride (memantine) for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prevents cognitive function failure as measured by cognitive decline on a battery of tests: the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test, and the Trail Making Test (TMT). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC preserves cognitive function as separately measured by the HVLT-R, COWA, TMT Parts A and B, and Clinical Trial Battery Composite (CTB COMP). II. Assess perceived difficulties in cognitive abilities using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. III. Assess symptom burden using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. IV. Compare cumulative incidence of intracranial disease progression after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. V. Compare overall survival after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. VI. Compare cumulative incidence of neurologic death after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. VII. Compare the number of salvage procedures used to manage recurrent intracranial disease following SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for SCLC brain metastases. VIII. Compare adverse events between the treatment arms according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0 criteria. IX. Compare the risk of developing cerebral necrosis between SRS and HA-WBRT plus memantine in patients receiving concurrent immunotherapy. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare cumulative incidence of local brain recurrence, distant brain relapse, and leptomeningeal dissemination after SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. II. Compare the cost of brain-related therapies and quality-adjusted life years in patients who receive SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. III. Evaluate the time delay to salvage WBRT or HA-WBRT in patients enrolled on the SRS arm. IV. Evaluate whether a time delay for chemotherapy has an effect on overall survival in patients receiving HA WBRT plus memantine relative to SRS for brain metastases from SCLC. V. Evaluate baseline magnetic resonance (MR) imaging biomarkers of white matter injury and hippocampal volumetry as potential predictors of cognitive decline and differential benefit from SRS relative to HA-WBRT plus memantine for brain metastases from SCLC. VI. Evaluate the correlation between neurocognitive functioning and patient-reported outcomes. VII. Collect serum, plasma and imaging studies for future translational research analyses. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo SRS over 1 day (in some cases several days). ARM II: Patients undergo HA-WBRT once daily (QD) for 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive memantine orally (PO) QD or twice daily (BID) for up to 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood sample collection and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2-3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo MRI
Given PO
Ancillary studies
Undergo SRS
Ancillary studies
Undergo HA-WBRT
Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGKaiser Permanente-Anaheim
Anaheim, California, United States
RECRUITINGKaiser Permanente-Bellflower
Bellflower, California, United States
RECRUITINGKaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Time to neurocognitive failure
A failure is defined using the reliable change index (RCI) criteria, as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test, and Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B. The cumulative incidence approach will be used to estimate the percentage of failures while accounting for the competing risk of death.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Preservation of neurocognitive function
Neurocognitive function will be measured by the HVLT-R, COWA, and TMT. The HVLT-R has 3 parts that will be analyzed separately: Total Recall, Delayed Recall, and Delayed Recognition. The TMT also has 2 parts that will be analyzed separately: TMT Part A and TMT Part B. The COWA has a single outcome measure that will be analyzed. Standardized scores that adjust for age, education, and sex when necessary will be analyzed.
Time frame: 1 year
Perceived difficulties in cognition
Measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The total raw score for a PROMIS short form would be the sum of the values of the response to each question (therefore, for a short form which all questions are answered, the lowest possible score is 4 and the highest possible raw score is 20).
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Symptom burden
Measured by MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT). Four subscales (symptom severity, symptom interference, neurologic factor, and cognitive factor score) as well as certain individual items (fatigue, neurologic factor items, and cognitive factor items) of the MDASI-BT will be analyzed.
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Time to intracranial disease progression
Time to any intracranial progression will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of intracranial disease progression. Death without an event will be treated as a competing risk. Alive patients without an event will be censored at their last known follow-up time. The percentage of patients with a failure will be determined using cumulative incidence.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of intracranial disease progression, assessed up to 10 years
Overall survival
Overall survival will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of death, or, otherwise, the last follow-up date on which the patient was reported alive. The Kaplan-Meier method (Kaplan 1958) will be used to calculate the percentage of patients alive.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death, or otherwise, the last follow-up date on which the patient was reported alive, assessed up to 10 years
Time to neurologic death
Time to neurologic death will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of neurologic death. Death without an event will be treated as a competing risk. Alive patients without an event will be censored at their last known follow-up time. The percentage of patients with a failure will be determined using cumulative incidence.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of neurologic death, assessed up to 10 years
Salvage procedures used to manage recurrent intracranial disease
Will be described by each arm.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Incidence of adverse events
Graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Counts and frequencies will be provided for the worst grade AE experienced by the patient by treatment arm.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Development of cerebral necrosis
Time frame: Up to 10 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGUSC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
RECRUITINGKaiser Permanente-Ontario
Ontario, California, United States
RECRUITINGUCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGUCHealth Memorial Hospital Central
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGMemorial Hospital North
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING...and 217 more locations