Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)100 enrolled

Overview

Enucleation of the prostate equips technology (usually laser) to effectively treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is considered the gold standard laser used to perform enucleation of the prostate. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life, as well as other postoperative outcomes. HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). A novel laser technology called thulium fiber laser (TFL) delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between TFL enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and m-HoLEP have yet to be described. This prospective study aims to compare the safety profile and clinical outcomes, peri-operatively up to one year post-operatively, between m-HoLEP and TFLEP with BPH and evidence of bladder obstruction.

Enucleation of the prostate equips technology (usually laser) to effectively treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is the longest running and most studied laser used to perform this minimally invasive procedure. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving IPSS and quality of life, as well as other positive postoperative outcomes. HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). A novel laser technology called thulium fiber laser (TFL) delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between TFL enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and m-HoLEP, to our knowledge, have yet to be described. This prospective study aims to compare the safety profile and clinical outcomes, peri-operatively up to one year post-operatively, between m-HoLEP and TFLEP with BPH and evidence of bladder obstruction. Variables of particular interest include the length of hospital stay and the need for blood transfusion, which are benefits of both techniques compared to transurethral resection of the prostate, the current gold standard of BPH treatment according to American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. The results of this study will guide urologists in selecting the most appropriate procedure from the growing armamentarium of treatments for BPH.

Interventions

TFLEPPROCEDURE

Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel laser technology that delivers a pulsed laser at a more optimal wavelength and a shallower depth of tissue penetration leading to better hemostatic properties. Patients will undergo thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing TFLEP is experienced in TFLEP procedures. Fifty (50) patients will undergo TFLEP.

m-HoLEPPROCEDURE

The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser is the longest running and most studied laser used to perform this minimally invasive procedure. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate reduces hospital stay and hemoglobin drop while improving IPSS and quality of life, as well as other positive postoperative outcomes compared to the historical gold standard, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HoLEP has been found to have a better enucleation efficiency rate and may have better hemostatic properties when combined with the modulated pulsed laser energy featured associated with Moses technology (m-HoLEP). Patients will undergo m-HoLEP at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal as a treatment for benign prostate hyperplasia. The surgeon performing m-HoLEP is experienced in m-HoLEP procedures. Fifty (50) patients will undergo m-HoLEP

Eligibility

Sex: MALEMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia : urinary retention, acute renal failure (post-renal), refractory hematuria, repeated urinary tract infections, refractory symptoms. * Prostates between 50-300 grams, * IPSS ≥ 8, * Inadequate response to previous medical treatments, * Qmax \< 15 ml/sec and * Providing informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * History of prostatic surgery, * History of prostate or bladder cancer, * Neurogenic bladder, * Urethral stricture, * Anticoagulant therapy (aspirin permitted), not ceased during surgery * Patients unfit for surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare the hospital stay between the thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (TFLEP) and the holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate with Moses technology (m-HoLEP).

Length of hospital stay following surgery, measured in hours and minutes.

Time frame: 1 day post-operatively

Secondary Outcomes

To compare intraoperative adverse events between cohorts

Incidence of bleeding and blood transfusion, injury or perforation of the bladder or urinary tract

Time frame: During surgery

To compare enucleation and morcellation time between cohorts

Enucleation time and morcellation time, measured in minutes.

Time frame: During surgery

To compare enucleation rate of instrumentation between cohorts

Enucleation rate, measured in enucleated tissue (mL) / time (minutes)

Time frame: During surgery

To compare operative time between cohorts

Operative time, measured in hours

Time frame: During surgery

To compare catheterization time between cohorts

Time until catheter was removed from participant post-surgery, measured in hours and minutes

Time frame: Up to 7-days post-operatively

To compare drop in International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) between cohorts

The International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the patient to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).