This clinical trial is to clarify and investigate the patterns of immune-related hepatitis and the optimal treatment choice for patients who are steroid-dependent. The project aims to prospectively characterize the various histopathological, biochemical, and phenotypical liver injury patterns induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors and the treatment responses to corticosteroids. Furthermore, the effect of adding a second-line immunosuppressive drug, either MMF in steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent cases will be explored and compared.
The number of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is expanding worldwide due to an increasing number of indications, including additional types of cancer, combination of ICI with other antineoplastic therapies and have recently moved into the adjuvant setting. According to clinical trial material, almost all patients in ICI treatment will eventually develop any grade of an adverse event, here, estimated in up to 90 percent of treated patients. Around 10-30 percent of ICI-treated patients will show signs of liver injury related to ICI treatment and will be diagnosed with immune-related hepatitis. The treatment hereof should include observation and medium-dose steroids in low-grade asymptomatic patients (grade ≤ 2 ir-hepatitis) and high-dose steroids in higher grades according to the current European and American guidelines. However, up to 25 percent of patients with ir-hepatitis may not respond properly to steroids due to primary resistance or relapse during tapering. These patients should be offered a second-line immunosuppressive treatment. The present recommendation for patients with steroid-dependent ir-hepatitis is based on the case series and includes immunosuppressive treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). To date, no evidence exists for which second-line treatment to choose. However, in the clinic, the initiation of MMF may be delayed, meanwhile, patients are typically treated with an increased dose of steroids. In some cases, an increased dose of steroids with prolonged tapering can be sufficient. We want to explore if increased doses of steroids or adding MMF is the best strategy for relapse of hepatitis. In addition, patients with signs of biliary or mixed liver injury may benefit from adding ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
Day 1: MMF 500 mg twice a day Day 2: MMF 1000 mg twice a day
2 mg/kg/day
Patients with mixed or cholestatic liver injury pattern will also be administrated peroral UDCA according to weight
Herlev University Hospital
Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
RECRUITINGAalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, Denmark
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
RECRUITINGTreatment-assessed hepatitis response rates
Treatment-assessed hepatitis response rates with steroids and steroids plus either mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to response or downgrading of liver injury in days
Time to response or downgrading of liver injury in patients with ≥grade 3 ir-hepatitis measured as; Days to ≥20 percent reduction in liver specific transaminases (ALT/AST) or bilirubin Days to shift to peroral prednisolone and discharge
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Relapse rate of immune related hepatitis ≥2 during tapering plan
Percent of patients with relapse to grade ≥2 hepatitis during steroid or during steroid plus either mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus tapering.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to downgrading of hepatotoxicity assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time to downgrading of hepatotoxicity from grade 4 to grade 3, to grade 2 and to grade 1, respectively, assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Description of histopathological changes in liver tissue
Number of patients with hepatocellular, cholestatic and mixed liver injury respectively, assessed by histological findings of predominant injury to hepatocytes, bile ducts or combined.
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Incidence of abnormal laboratory test results
Incidence of abnormal laboratory test results in blood
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Shift from solu-medrol IV to peroral prednisolon. A tapering plan will be performed.
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
RECRUITINGOdense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
RECRUITINGCumulated doses of corticosteroids and MMF respectively
Cumulated doses of corticosteroids and MMF respectively, during the study period of 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Cancer progression free survival at 6 months
Cancer progression free survival at 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years
Overall survival rates at 6 months
Overall survival rates at 6 months
Time frame: Until completion of the study, an average of 5 years