This study assesses the potential benefit of adjuvant platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with carpal tunnel release (CTR) for patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). CTR is a rather common procedure performed and seems to be quite effective for those with moderate CTS, but a number of patients with severe CTS do not have quite the same response post-CTR. The investigators will recruit patients who fall into the severe CTS category and compare CTR with and without adjuvant PRP to see if PRP can improve outcomes of this common surgery.
1. Study team recruits patients with severe CTS who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria in an outpatient hand surgery clinic. Patients will be consented by the research team if the patient agrees to participate in the research study. 2. This will be a single blinded study, and participants will have an equal chance to be placed in either group. Participants will be randomized using permuted block randomization predetermined by our dedicated orthopedic biostatistician into two study groups: those that undergo CTR with adjuvant intra-operative PRP and those that undergo CTR without adjuvant PRP. All participants will have a pre-operative electromyography/nerve conduction study (EMG/NCS). 3. Primary outcome measures (BCTQ and grip strength), and secondary outcome measures (PROMIS; 2 point discrimination - thumb, index finger and middle finger; key pinch; 3 finger pinch; and EMG/NCS results) will be collected and stored in REDCap at initial visit. BCTQ and PROMIS will actually be available online for patient to complete at the patient's convenience. 4. Patients will undergo CTR with or without adjuvant PRP (based on assigned study group). Patients will not know which group the subject is in (single blinded). 5. BCTQ and PROMIS will be collected online at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively. EMG/NCS will only be performed preoperatively and at 6 months post-operatively in the Sports Medicine clinic. At the 6-month visit, the investigators will also collect data on 2 point discrimination, grip strength, key pinch, and 3 finger pinch. 6. The investigators will store data in REDCap. 7. Data will be analyzed with the assistance of our biostatistician, and results will be written up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
CTR is performed with adjuvant PRP placed intra-operatively.
CTR is performed without adjuvant PRP placed intra-operatively.
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, United States
Number of Participants With Severe or Very Severe Symtoms as Measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Patient-reported questionnaire that examines symptom severity and overall functional status of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Symptoms are rated on a 5 point Likert scale. 1 = Minimal 2 = Mild 3 = Moderate 4 = Severe 5 = Very Severe.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Number of Participants With Severe or Very Severe Symtoms as Measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Patient-reported questionnaire that examines symptom severity and overall functional status of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Symptoms are rated on a 5 point Likert scale. 1 = Minimal 2 = Mild 3 = Moderate 4 = Severe 5 = Very Severe.
Time frame: 3 months post-op
Number of Participants With Severe or Very Severe Symtoms as Measured by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
Patient-reported questionnaire that examines symptom severity and overall functional status of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Symptoms are rated on a 5 point Likert scale. 1 = Minimal 2 = Mild 3 = Moderate 4 = Severe 5 = Very Severe.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Grip Strength
Measured with a dynamometer.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Grip Strength
Measured with a dynamometer.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
A computer-adaptive test was developed to improve precision and reduce question burden for upper-extremity conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome. The PROMIS measures self-reported function using a 5-point scale (higher score indicates better function) and produces standardized T-scores based on the general U.S. population with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher T-scores indicating better upper-extremity function.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
15
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
A computer-adaptive test was developed to improve precision and reduce question burden for upper-extremity conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome. The PROMIS measures self-reported function using a 5-point scale (higher score indicates better function) and produces standardized T-scores based on the general U.S. population with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher T-scores indicating better upper-extremity function.
Time frame: 3 months post-op
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
A computer-adaptive test was developed to improve precision and reduce question burden for upper-extremity conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome. The PROMIS measures self-reported function using a 5-point scale (higher score indicates better function) and produces standardized T-scores based on the general U.S. population with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-score ranges from 20 to 80, with higher T-scores indicating better upper-extremity function.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
2 Point Discrimination at Thumb
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Thumb
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
2 Point Discrimination at Thumb
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Thumb
Time frame: 6 months post-op
2 Point Discrimination at Index Finger
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Index Finger
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
2 Point Discrimination at Index Finger
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Index Finger
Time frame: 6 months post-op
2 Point Discrimination at Middle Finger
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Middle Finger
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
2 Point Discrimination at Middle Finger
Count of participants able or not able to discriminate between the minimal distance of 2 separate points of touch on the Middle Finger
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Key Pinch
Measured with a pinch meter.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Key Pinch
Measured with a pinch meter.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
3 Finger Pinch
Measured with a pinch meter.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
3 Finger Pinch
Measured with a pinch meter.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Median Motor Latency
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Median Motor Latency
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Median Motor Amplitude
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Median Motor Amplitude
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Median Sensory Latency
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Median Sensory Latency
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
Median Sensory Amplitude
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
Median Sensory Amplitude
From EMG/NCS data.
Time frame: 6 months post-op
EMG of Abductor Pollicis Brevis
From EMG/NCS data - looking at spontaneous activity with signs of denervation or reinnervation. Denervation included increased insertional activity, fibs/sharps, and decreased recruitment. Reinnervation included increased amplitude and polymorphic waves
Time frame: up to 1 month pre-op
EMG of Abductor Pollicis Brevis
From EMG/NCS data - looking at spontaneous activity with signs of denervation or reinnervation. Denervation included increased insertional activity, fibs/sharps, and decreased recruitment. Reinnervation included increased amplitude and polymorphic waves
Time frame: 6 months post-op