Diabetes mellitus currently affects 463 million people worldwide. One of the most serious complications of diabetes is the diabetic foot. Adequate foot care behaviours reduce the risk of ulcers, infections, and amputations, and improve the quality of life, in these patients. This Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial aims to analyse the impact of different educational strategies - an instructive video (Video Watching Group - Experimental Group 1) compared with a leaflet on foot care with real-time guided reading (Real-Time Leaflet Reading Group - Experimental Group 2) and with standard teaching on diabetic foot care (Standard Care - Control Group) - on adherence and knowledge regarding diabetic foot care, as well as on patient's perception of their foot health. Participants will be assessed at the first consultation of the diabetic foot (T0), about two weeks after the first assessment (T1), and three months after the T0 in a follow-up assessment (T2), with T1 and T2 being performed through telephone calls, after obtaining the patients' consent. The results of the present study will inform educational interventions regarding foot care adherence in patients with diabetic foot, in order to decrease the likelihood of developing diabetic foot ulcers and, consequently, to reduce amputation rates and the several associated costs, contributing to improving patients' quality of life.
Specific Aims 1. To analyze the contribution of sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables to diabetic foot care adherence and knowledge, and perceived foot health, over time. 2. To analyze the differences between groups over time in diabetic foot care adherence, knowledge on foot care, and perceived foot health. 3. To examine the mediating role of representations about diabetic foot in the relationship between knowledge about foot care and adherence to diabetic foot care, over time, controlling for health literacy. 4. To examine the moderating role of foot pain, foot function, and footwear between representations about diabetic foot and adherence to diabetic foot care/ perceived foot health, over time. Data Analysis: Generalized Mixed Models, which allow examining changes over time including longitudinal mediation and moderation. Sample size calculation: Considering a dropout rate of 10%, the sample size required is 60 patients (20 per group). Procedure: Participants will be assessed at the first consultation of the diabetic foot (T0), about two weeks after the first assessment (T1), and three months after the T0 in a follow-up assessment (T2), with T1 and T2 being performed through telephone calls.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
71
In the video, the diabetic foot care is presented verbally and appropriately captioned, as well as exemplified by real patients and health professionals from the hospital
The leaflet has information about diabetic foot care. Researcher will guide its reading with patients.
Patients receive a leaflet about diabetic foot care to read at home.
Face-to-face teaching includes the teaching about diabetic foot care during the consultation by health professionals.
Clínica do Pé Diabético, Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa
Penafiel, Porto District, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto
Porto, Portugal
Adherence to the diabetic foot care behaviours
Adherence to foot care behaviors will be assessed through the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Foot Care (Lincoln, Jeffcoate, Ince, Smith, \& Radford, 2007). Composed of 29 items whose answers are given on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores correspond to a higher frequency of foot care behaviors.
Time frame: Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Adherence to the diabetic foot care behaviours
The level of foot self-care (indirect measure of adherence) will be assessed through the subscale of Foot Care of the Summary Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (Original Version by Toobert, Hampson, \& Glasgow, 2000; Portuguese Version by Bastos, Severo, \& Lopes, 2007). Composed of 3 items in which patients are asked how many of the last seven days did they perform the respective foot care behaviour. Therefore, answers are given on a scale between 0 and 7, and its score is calculated through the mean number of days. Higher scores indicate higher levels of foot self-care.
Time frame: Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Knowledge on foot care
Knowledge on foot care will be assessed through the Questionnaire on Knowledge of Foot Care (Hasnain \& Sheikh, 2009). Each correct answer is scored with 1 point and higher scores indicate better knowledge about foot care.
Time frame: Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
General foot health
General foot health will be assessed through the respective subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ; Bennett, Patterson, Wearing, \& Baglioni, 1998). Scores are transformed into a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 corresponds to the perception of poor foot health state/condition and 100 to the perception of excellent foot health.
Time frame: Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Representations about diabetic foot
Representations about diabetic foot will be assessed through the Illness Perception Questionnaire - Brief (IPQ-B; Figueiras et al., 2010). The response scale ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more threatening representations regarding diabetic foot.
Time frame: Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.