Patients with heart failure (HF) represent a large population of patients who are at high risk for complications related to undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). However, currently there are limited modalities for early AF detection and subsequent stroke prevention in this high-risk population. An implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is inserted subcutaneously and can provide long term arrhythmia information via remote monitoring. The ASSERT-AF study seeks to accurately define the burden of AF and other arrhythmias in high-risk HF patients using an ASSERT ICM.
Over 6 million people in the United States suffer from heart failure (HF). By the year 2030 the prevalence of HF is expected to exceed 8 million people. Heart failure accounts for 1 million hospital admissions each year, costing our economy in excess of $30 billion dollars per year. Mortality in patients with HF remains high, and nearly half of all patients diagnosed with HF will die within 5 years. More than half of all patients admitted with HF decompensation have preserved left ventricular systolic function. Patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular systolic function are at high risk for developing atrial fibrillation (AF), the occurrence of which often contributes to HF decompensation and increases morbidity and all-cause mortality. Similarly, patients with AF are at high risk for developing HF due to loss of atrio-ventricular synchrony and rapid uncontrolled ventricular rates. Detection of AF can be challenging and may go undiagnosed in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients through conventional monitoring methods. Patients with HF represent a large population who are at risk for complications related to undiagnosed AF. AF increases the risk of stroke five-fold and the risk of death nearly two-fold. Moreover, strokes related to AF are twice as likely to be fatal or severely disabling compared to strokes due to other causes, such as ischemic small vessel disease or atheromatous large vessel disease. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), can be used for the early detection of AF in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with HF. However, current guidelines provide an indication for prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) only in HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, whereas there are limited data for device-based detection of AF in HF patients with more preserved LVEF. Implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) are devices that can be injected into the subcutaneous tissue and can provide automatic electrocardiographic recordings of asymptomatic arrhythmias as well as patient triggered electrocardiographic recordings of symptomatic episodes during long term follow-up. Implantable cardiac monitors are be paired with remote monitoring systems, capable of rapid remote review of electrograms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that a management strategy that incorporates ICM implantation in patients with HF and LVEF \>35% will result in a significantly higher rate of AF detection leading to arrhythmia related interventions compared to conventional monitoring and follow-up in patients with HF.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
477
Subjects will be subcutaneously implanted with an Abbott ASSERT ICM with the device implant procedure per standard of care and current labelling. Data related to subjects' arrhythmias, via the Merlin.net Patient CareNetwork will be transmitted on a monthly basis to the treating physician and subsequently to the study coordination and database center (CCRC) at the University of Rochester. Data on the frequency/types of symptomatic (patient triggered) versus ICM detected (asymptomatic) arrhythmic events will be collected and adjudicated. Clinical data on medication, device interventions, cardiovascular events will be collected at follow-up visits.
Subjects randomized to the conventional management arm of the trial will undergo arrhythmia monitoring based on clinical indications and per standard available modalities including periodic electrocardiograms (ECG), Holter and/or event monitoring.
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
RECRUITINGMedian Time to first detection of AF lasting > 5 minutes
Defined as ICM detected AF in the intervention (implantable cardiac monitor) arm or captured by clinical symptoms and documented by ECG or Holter in the conventional arm.
Time frame: 24 months
Time to initiation of guideline directed anti-arrhythmic and HF interventions
Interventions such AF ablation, initiation of antiarrhythmic, anticoagulation, beta-blocker therapy and others.
Time frame: 24 months
Number cardiovascular hospitalizations or death
Total number of cardiovascular hospitalizations or death in each arm.
Time frame: 24 months
Compare healthcare utilization using Abbott ICM vs. non-ICM monitoring.
Including emergency department visits, unplanned office visits, cardiovascular hospitalization or death
Time frame: 24 months
Mean quality of life measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
All KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent.
Time frame: 24 months
Mean percentage of time spent in atrial fibrillation (AF Burden)
AF burden, defined as average percentage of time spent in AF (i.e. amount of time spent in AF divided by the total amount of time a patient was monitored). AF burden will be quantified only in the intervention arm.
Time frame: 24 months
Time to detection of composite of arrhythmic events endpoint
Arrhythmic events consisting of AF, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and high-risk bradyarrhythmias (high degree AV block or sinus pause \> 5 seconds), whichever occurs first.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.