Risk Stratification of Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding to the Emergency Department Using AIMS65 Score and Red Cell Distribution Width

Overview

The rationale of this study in UGIB patients is to assess whether the prediction of mortality and morbidity using AIMS65 score improves when used in combination with RDW in the emergency department setting.

UGIB is a ticking time-bomb and emergency physicians are challenged to accurately assess risk, and aggressively manage patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within the stipulated time in the confines of emergency department. If not managed properly, it is associated with high mortality. Various clinical prediction scores help in risk stratifying such patients. Among the scores, AIMS65 score is the easy to use score and has good mortality predictive accuracy. RDW, once thought as marker of chronic blood loss has recently been identified as a good prognostic indicator as well as good predictor of mortality in conditions where there is acute blood loss. Both AIMS65 score and RDW value have been used separately as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with UGIB. But there are not much studies so far evaluating their combined role as marker of predicting mortality as well as high risk among UGIB patients. Hence there is a need for a study to know the predictive value of combination of AIMS6S score and RDW in patients presenting to ED with symptoms of UGIB not been much studies comparing the relationship between RDW and upper GI bleed. The rationale of this study in UGIB patients is to assess whether the prediction of mortality and morbidity using AIMS65 score improves when used in combination with RDW in the emergency department setting.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes