Although the notions that kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease and that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant is the only treatment able to restore euglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and selected patients with type 2 diabetes, are now consolidated, rates of transplantation remain low among potential candidates with high levels of preformed anti-HLA antibodies. Most of the data comes from the experience in kidney transplant but can be easily translated to pancreas transplant. Approximately 30% of patients on the transplant waiting list have evidence of sensitization in the form of alloantibodies, generated from exposure to previous transplants, blood transfusions, pregnancy, or other events. The presence of a panel-reactive antibody level of at least 80% (i.e. a high level of sensitization) creates difficulty in finding matched kidneys from compatible donors, leading to lower rates of transplantation in highly sensitized candidates compared to non-sensitized; the longer waiting times translates in an increased mortality rate. Despite the development of desensitization strategies and the advancement in immunosuppression protocols, it is apparent that transplanting these patients carries an increased risk of acute antibody mediated rejection; 25%-50% of transplants will have an early acute antibody mediated rejection . Most of these rejections can be successfully treated, but a high rate of transplant glomerulopathy and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) leading to accelerated allograft failure is common.
Although the notions that kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease and that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant is the only treatment able to restore euglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and selected patients with type 2 diabetes, are now consolidated, rates of transplantation remain low among potential candidates with high levels of preformed anti-HLA antibodies. Most of the data comes from the experience in kidney transplant but can be easily translated to pancreas transplant. Approximately 30% of patients on the transplant waiting list have evidence of sensitization in the form of alloantibodies, generated from exposure to previous transplants, blood transfusions, pregnancy, or other events. The presence of a panel-reactive antibody level of at least 80% (i.e. a high level of sensitization) creates difficulty in finding matched kidneys from compatible donors, leading to lower rates of transplantation in highly sensitized candidates compared to non-sensitized; the longer waiting times translates in an increased mortality rate. Despite the development of desensitization strategies and the advancement in immunosuppression protocols, it is apparent that transplanting these patients carries an increased risk of acute antibody mediated rejection; 25%-50% of transplants will have an early acute antibody mediated rejection . Most of these rejections can be successfully treated, but a high rate of transplant glomerulopathy and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) leading to accelerated allograft failure is common. This protocol has been designed to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of spleen transplant as a desensitization strategy for highly sensitized patients, potential candidates of kidney or simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant with (positive cross-match by flow cytometry (T or B) or B positive standard cross-match). After obtaining surgical and research consent at a pre-transplant clinic visit, patients will be receiving spleen transplant followed by spleen removal and kidney or simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant. Duration of the subject participation will begin upon consent and will last for one year after the surgery. Incidence of treated acute rejection (humoral or cellulo-mediated) within the first year (defined as biopsy proven or clinically indicated) will be determined. Graft and patient survival will be monitored and compared with a cohort of highly sensitized patients with similar immunological characteristics, treated with our standard protocol. DSA levels and post-transplant cross-match will be determined.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Spleen transplantation/removal and kidney transplantation alone or simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation in highly sensitized patients with either a positive flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM) (T or B cell positive) or a complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross-match (B cell positive).
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rate of successful spleen transplantations/removals that can overcome the immunological barrier of positive T flow crossmatch and allow better results in kidney transplant recipients with high cPRA compared to the standard treatment.
Rate of successful spleen transplantations/removals that can overcome the immunological barrier of positive T flow crossmatch and allow better results in kidney transplant recipients with high cPRA compared to the standard treatment.
Time frame: 3 years
Rate of graft success
Rate of graft will be monitored and compared with a cohort of highly sensitized patient and positive T flow crossmatch, treated with our standard protocol.
Time frame: 3 years
Rate of patient survival
Rate of patient survival will be monitored and compared with a cohort of highly sensitized patient and positive T flow crossmatch, treated with our standard protocol.
Time frame: 3 years
Rate of T flow crossmatch that becomes negative
Rate of T flow crossmatch that becomes negative, leading to less rejections and consequent improved kidney function.
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.