The quality of the rehabilitation of deafness in children with cochlear implantation is a major prognostic factor for the outcome on speech comprehension and oral expression. This rehabilitation is carried out cooperatively by the hospital cochlear implantation team, and by a speech therapist located near the child's home. The multi-weekly sessions represent a constraint for the child and his parents. Complementary training work at home would make it possible to balance the equity in the distribution of care in the territory, and should promote the progress of the child, who is more inclined to use a tool available at home.
The humanoid robot should allow an ecological approach to this additional rehabilitation. Before developing this approach, it is necessary to study the acceptability of the humanoid robot at home, both by the parents and by the cochlear implanted child. The main objective of this study is to assess the acceptability by the child and his family, of a humanoid robot installed at home for one month. The secondary objectives are to describe the acceptability of the child and his family that is the relationship to technology, the intention of use, expectations, perceived utility, perception of the robot and facilitating conditions before then after 1 month of using the robot at home, \- describe the child's acceptability with respect to his experience, his fun and the emotions felt when he uses the robot at home
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
A humanoid robot will be installed for 30 days in children. It has a touchscreen tablet, allowing manual interaction complementing the voice interaction. The robot speaks, hears, and has facial and voice identification.
University Hospital Toulouse - Service d'ORL, ORL pédiatrique et Otoneurologie
Toulouse, France
Acceptability of a humanoid robot
assess by the number of weekly hours during which the child uses the robot.
Time frame: month 1
Relationship to technology
Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Time frame: month 1
Intention of use
Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Time frame: month 1
Relationship with the robot
Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Time frame: month 1
User experience
Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Time frame: Month 1
participants' expectations
Measurement by sentence completion which consists of giving the beginning of a sentence and letting the user complete the rest of the sentence
Time frame: Month 1
3Emethod
Evaluation of emotions in the form of a drawing with a speech bubble and a thought bubble.
Time frame: Month 1
classification of activities
classification according to various criteria (good functioning, fun, ease of use)
Time frame: Month 1
Feedback
with a Semi-structured interview on the use of the robot
Time frame: Month 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.