Financial hardship is an important risk factor for suicide. However, there are no evidence-based interventions to help individuals at risk for suicide to improve their financial situation. The intervention will support participants to address their financial difficulties (e.g., indebtedness, inability to meet basic needs) by coaching them to develop key financial management skills (e.g., budgeting, debt management), create a financial wellness action plan, map and activate their social networks, and connecting them with community-based financial supports (e.g., free financial counseling, publicly funded housing and food supports). The intervention will be facilitated by trained peer coaches. The intervention will consist of three phases: (1) intensive; (2) intermediate; and (3) follow-up. The 6-week intensive phase will consist of 6 weekly group sessions and 4 one-on-one coaching sessions to navigate financial resources. The intermediate phase will consist of 3 biweekly group sessions, and either 3 biweekly or 2 monthly one-on-one coaching sessions, based on participant preference. The follow-up phase will offer 3 monthly group sessions, and either 3 monthly or 6 biweekly one-on-one coaching sessions based on participant preference. Group and one-on-one coaching sessions will be conducted remotely via a HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing platform. This study will consist of five steps: (1) obtaining input from stakeholders to develop the intervention; (2) piloting it with a small sample of participants (n=10); (3) using this information to revise the intervention; (4) testing it in a randomized controlled trial with individuals experiencing financial hardship and suicide risk (n=96); and (5) finalizing the intervention manual.
Decades of research have shown that financial hardship is a key risk factor for suicide. Studies have consistently found higher prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide death among individuals experiencing financial hardship, such as unmanageable debts and difficulty paying for basic needs (e.g., housing, food). Stressful financial events (e.g., loss of income, evictions) are well-documented reasons for and precipitants of suicidal behavior. An increase in suicidal behavior is not only associated with objective aspects of financial hardship (e.g., number of debts, income level), but also with how hardship is experienced by individuals (e.g., financial threat, financial shame). In fact, growing evidence suggests that subjective financial hardship mediates the relationship between objective financial hardship and suicidal behavior. Despite overwhelming evidence about the economic determinants of suicide, evidence-based interventions to reduce suicide risk and financial hardship are unavailable. Suicide prevention interventions at the individual level have largely focused on identifying or treating symptoms of psychiatric distress and other immediate clinical factors. Ecological-level interventions have mostly focused on increasing suicide awareness and reducing access to the means of suicide. To address this gap, our project aims to develop a peer-led intervention that includes strategies and tools to reduce objective and subjective financial hardship, with the goal of decreasing hopelessness, shame, and depression (risk factors for suicide), increasing hope and life satisfaction (protective factors for suicide), and thereby reducing suicidal ideation and behaviors. The main outcome of this study will be a manualized intervention to lessen financial hardship as a risk factor for suicidal ideation and behavior. If the findings of this study support its feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and initial efficacy, the investigators will formalize a peer coach training program, further develop an intervention fidelity measure, and pursue a randomized controlled trial to test intervention efficacy. Specific aims and hypotheses are as follows: 1. With multi-stakeholder input, develop and iteratively revise From Hardship to Hope, a peer-led financial empowerment intervention with group and individual components to reduce SI/behaviors and financial hardship. 2. Assess the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of the intervention using qualitative and quantitative methods. 3. Examine its initial efficacy by regular evaluations over 24 weeks on suicidal ideation (SI) severity and intensity, objective and subjective financial hardship, protective factors of suicide (e.g., hope, life satisfaction), and risk factors of suicide (e.g., hopelessness, depression). We hypothesize that, compared to the control arm, the intervention arm will show greater reductions in SI severity and intensity, hopelessness, and objective and subjective financial hardship, and greater increases in financial self-efficacy and hope from baseline to 24 weeks. 4. Explore the intervention's mechanisms of action (e.g., level of participation, subjective financial hardship). We hypothesize that the amount of change in SI severity and intensity will be positively correlated with the change in subjective financial hardship, and both will be associated with the level of participation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
96
The intervention will be delivered in three consecutive phases: 1. Intensive Intervention Phase (weeks 1 to 6), consisting of 6 weekly group sessions and 4 one-on-one coaching sessions to navigate financial resources. 2. Intermediate Phase (weeks 7 to 12), consisting of 3 biweekly group sessions, and either 3 biweekly or 2 monthly one-on-one coaching sessions, based on participant preference. 3. Follow up Phase (weeks 13 to 24), consisting of 3 monthly group sessions, and either 3 monthly or 6 biweekly one-on-one coaching sessions based on participant preference. Key intervention components: 1. Peer-led group sessions 2. Individual peer coaching sessions to complement group sessions
Enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU) consists of ongoing clinical care with a licensed mental health clinician, representing the current standard of care, plus provision of financial wellness informational resources. These resources include a Financial Wellness Navigator (a curated directory of financial wellness services available to New Yorkers) and a handout describing free financial counseling services and how to access them. The control condition does not include peer-led group sessions, individualized peer coaching, or warm referrals that are part of the From Hardship to Hope intervention.
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, United States
TFA: Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) Questionnaire Change
A questionnaire designed to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions across design, evaluation, and implementation phases. It consists of seven domains: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. The measure includes items assessing both prospective and retrospective acceptability.
Time frame: Week 1, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
TEI-SF: Treatment Evaluation Inventory Change
A 9-item version of the original 15-item Treatment Evaluation Inventory, assessing treatment acceptability and ethical concerns.
Time frame: Week 1, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale - Intensity of Ideation Sub-scale Change
Interview-based assessment of suicide ideation intensity. It consists of 5 items measuring frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for Ideation. Sub-scale values range from 2 to 25. Higher scores indicate greater suicidal ideation intensity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Change
21-item instrument for detecting and measuring the current intensity of specific attitudes, behaviors, and plans to die by suicide during the past week. The first 19 items assess the intensity of suicidality on a 3-point scale. Total score for these items ranges from 0 to 38, with greater scores indicating more severe suicidal ideation intensity. The final two items assess the number of previous suicide attempts and the severity of the intent to die associated with the last attempt.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
Economic Hardship Questionnaire Change
12-item self-report scale measuring family economic hardship and changes in a household's style of living in the past 6 months (e.g., drop in income, ability meet basic needs). Values range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate greater recent economic hardship.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
E-FwT: ENGAGE Financial Wellness Tool Change
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale (IFDFW) Change
An 8-item self-report scale assessing financial distress and well-being on a continuum. Higher scores indicate greater financial well-being, while lower scores reflect higher financial distress. The scale provides a subjective measure of an individual's financial situation based on perceived stress and stability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
Financial Hardship Screener
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.