This a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind phase II study to explore the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of sonlicromanol in children (from birth to 17 years) with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease of which the gene defect is known to decrease one or more oxidative phosphorylation system enzymes and who suffer from motor symptoms ("KHENERGYC").
Mitochondrial Diseases (MD) are rare progressive, multi-system, often early onset and fatal disorders affecting both children and adults. Despite advances in the understanding of mitochondrial disorders, treatment options are extremely limited and, to date, largely supportive. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel treatments. Sonlicromanol (KH176) is an orally bio-available small molecule under development for the treatment of these disorders. The current study will explore the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of sonlicromanol in children (from birth to 17 years) with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease of which the gene defect is known to decrease one or more oxidative phosphorylation system enzymes and who suffer from motor symptoms. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of sonlicromanol on motor symptom severity in children with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease affecting oxidative phosphorylation during a 6 month treatment period (GMFM). The trial consists of 2 phases, with the main phase being a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind, phase II parallel group study to explore the efficacy and safety of sonlicromanol in twenty-four (24) children with mitochondrial disease and motor symptoms,. The first phase is an adaptive PharmacoKinetics (PK) study with 4 days treatment (to expected steady state in most subjects) in the following age-groups: birth - 1 year, 1-2 years, 2- 6 years, 6-12 years, and 12 - 17 years. An age group should have at least 3 subjects before being analysed. Subjects will take 4 days of open-label sonlicromanol orally at the anticipated adult-equivalent dose. After completion of enrolment in an age group, the PK data from that age group will be analysed to confirm the adult-equivalent dose that will be used thereafter in the second phase of the trial. Older age groups will be studied before younger age groups. In the second phase subjects will be randomized (by age group) over 2 groups. Group 1 will receive an adult-equivalent dose of sonlicromanol twice daily orally for 26 weeks. Group 2 will receive matching placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. A final follow-up visit is scheduled 2 weeks after the intake of the last dose of the treatment period. Duration of Subject Participation: The overall study duration of the trial for a eligible subject is estimated to be approximately 7 months, consisting of up to 4 weeks screening, 26 weeks (6 months) of treatment and 2 week post-treatment follow-up. At the end of the study treatment all participants will be offered to continue treatment with sonlicromanol during a open label extension (OLE) trial for 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
24
Oral administration of sonlicromanol twice daily
Oral administration of matching placebo twice daily
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Motor Symptom Severity as assessed with the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the GMFM-88.The GMFM-88 consists of 88 questions and assesses motor function in 5 domains (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping). 4-point scoring system for each item, item scores ranges from 0-3. Higher scores denote better performance. Scaled score indicates the percentage of total score. Total score ranges from 0-100%
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Fine manual motor skills as assessed with the 9 Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the NHPT. The NHPT examines the fine hand motor skills by assessing the speed of movement of the hand.The fastest time of 2 attempts is recorded for the dominant hand as well as the non-dominant hand. When the maximum time is reached (50 seconds) the number of transported rods is counted (maximum = 18; minimum = 0). Faster times (in sec) and higher number of rods denote better performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Spasticity as assessed with the Modified Tardieu Scale for spasticity (MTS)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the MTS. The MTS quantifies spasticity by assessing the muscle's response to stretch applied at three specified velocities (as slow as possible; speed of limb falling under gravity; moving as fast as possible) and rating the intensity and duration of the muscle reaction to stretch and the joint angle. The quality of the muscle reaction (spasticity grade) is scored on a 5-grade scale (range: 'No resistance throughout the course of the movement' to 'Joint immovable'). Lower scores denote better performance. The Spasticity Angle X is the difference between the angles of arrest at slow speed and of catch-and release or clonus at fast speed; the Spasticity Grade Y is an ordinal variable that grades the intensity (gain) of the muscle reaction to fast stretch. The outcome parameter of angle (in degrees, range: 0-180 degrees) can only be determined with spasticity grade 2 and higher.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Dystonia as assessed with Dystonia (Barry-Albright Dystonia scale (BAD)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the BAD. The BAD assesses dystonia in eight body regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and the four extremities. Dystonia is scored as none (0), slight (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Individual scores for each region are added for a total score. total score ranging from 0-32. A higher score denotes worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Ataxia as assessed with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the SARA. The SARA is a semi- quantitative assessment of a range of different impairments in cerebellar ataxia. The scale is an 8-item based scale related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin test. The score ranges from 'no ataxia' (0) to 'most severe ataxia' (40). A higher score denotes worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Disability as assessed with the PEDI-CAT (Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the PEDI-CAT. The PEDI-CAT is a computer adaptive caregiver report which estimates a child's abilities from a minimal number of the most relevant items or from a set number of items within three functional domains: Daily Activities, Mobility, Social/Cognitive, and Responsibility. \<= 30 items per domain. Higher scores denote better performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Mitochondrial disease signs and symptoms as assessed with the International Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (IPMDS)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the IPMDS. The IPMDS assesses all aspects of mitochondrial disease by exploring three domains: a) 'complaints and symptoms' (23 items), b) 'physical examination' (21 items) and c) 'functional tests' (13 items). The domain and total scores are expressed as the percentage of items which were feasible to perform (maximum = 100%; minimum = 0%. A higher score denotes better performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Caregiver burden as assessed with the ZARIT-12 Burden scale (ZBI-12)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the ZBI-12. The ZBI-12 assesses caregiver perceptions of burden by indicating the extent of burden experienced while providing care to their child. The responses on the scale range from 'not at all' to 'extremely'. Total scores are obtained by summing the item scores, maximum = 48; minimum = 0). higher scores denote higher burden.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Quality of life as assessed with the Neurology Quality of life short Form (NeuroQL-SF)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the NeuroQL-SF. The Fatigue Short Form Paediatric version is an 8-item score evaluating the perception of fatigue and its impact in daily life activities. Scores on individual items range from 1-5. The total score ranges from 5-40. Higher score denotes worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Clinician-scored global impression of change (CGIC)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the CGIC. The CGIC assesses the clinician's perception of the degree to which patient's illness/symptoms have improved or worsened following intervention using a 7-point Likert scale. Score ranges from 1-7. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Patient/Caregiver scored global impression of change (PGIC)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the PGIC. The PGIC assesses patient's/caregiver's perception of the degree to which patient's illness/symptoms have improved or worsened following intervention using a 7-point Likert scale. Score ranges from 1-7. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Patient/Caregiver scored impression of change on patient-identified 3 Most Bothersome Symptoms (MBSA) caused by mitochondrial disease
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the MBSA. The MBSA assesses patient/caregiver scored impression of the degree to which each of the 3 patient-identified most bothersome symptoms caused by mitochondrial disease have improved or worsened following intervention. Score ranges from 1-7 for each of the symptoms. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Growth as assessed by weight
Changes from baseline to each assessment of weight in kilogram (Kg)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Growth as assessed by height
Changes from baseline to each assessment of height in centimeters (cm)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Growth as assessed by head circumference
Changes from baseline to each assessment of head circumference in centimeters (cm), for children younger than 3 years only.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Growth as assessed by Body Mass Index (BMI)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of BMI, weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2 children aged 3 years and above
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
Temperature
Changes from baseline to each assessment of temperature in degree Celsius
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29
10 meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Changes from baseline to each assessment of the 10MWT. The 10MWT assesses the patients' physical ability to walk/run, the patients' walking speed and stamina. The patient is instructed to walk/run 10 meters and the time is measured while the patient walks the set distance. Faster times (in sec) denotes better performance.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29