Triangulation Bulls Eye and Stone Direct Targeting Pcnl

Overview

To assess the impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of renal stones by comparing the Triangulation and ''eye of the needle'' (or bull's eye) and the stone targeted techniques in the following:- 1. Stone free rate (SFR) (primary outcome). 2. Complicatins of surgery (primary outcome). 3. Change in haematocrit pre and postoperative (secondary outcome). 4. Operative time (secondary outcome). 5. Duration of hospitalization (secondary outcome). . 7-Fluroscpic screening time (FST) (secondary outcome). . 8- Change in haematocrit pre and postoperative (secondary outcome).

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is an appropriate first-line alternative for the management of kidney stones that are larger than 2 cm in diameter and that do not respond to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) \[1,2\]. Percutaneous renal access is the most important step in PNL, and the adequacy of access directly affects the success and complication rates of this procedure. Among C-arm fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography (US), C-arm fluoroscopy is the most commonly used imaging technique to access the intrarenal collecting system \[3-4\]. Various fluoroscopy techniques have been described for achieving a good access. One can use fluoroscopy or ultrasonography or a combination of both for reaching the target calyx. Each of it has its advantages and disadvantages, and no consensus exists showing the superiority of one or the other \[5\]. Triangulation and ''eye of the needle'' (or bull's eye) techniques are two common methods to obtain proper percutaneous renal access under fluoroscopy guidance \[6-7\]. Multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging is essential in both techniques to make a proper renal puncture. Biplanar access is based on mediolateral and cephalad-caudal movements of the needle, with the depth of the puncture adjusted based on different fluoroscopic projections, including oblique, vertical, and 30° positions \[6, 8\]. Most published studies of PCNL have focused on evaluating the effect of patient- and stone-related factors such as success rate, extent of bleeding, complication rate, fluoroscopic Screening times (FSTs), and operative time on outcomes. \[9-10\] The imaging modalities used for guidance by urologists or radiologists during percutaneous renal access and renal access procedures have also recently been analyzed and compared in terms of outcomes and complications.\[11-12\] These studies, however, have not considered the effect of percutaneous renal access technique on outcome. Although the triangulation and the bull's-eye techniques have been evaluated and compared using a biologic model in a published study \[13\], no clinical study comparing these techniques has been performed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of percutaneous renal access technique on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of renal stones by comparing the Triangulation and ''eye of the needle'' (or bull's eye) and the stone targeted technique .

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Central Contacts