Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection of immunocompromised hosts which causes in significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg/day of TMP, is associated with serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced liver injury, cytopenia, and renal failure occurring among 20-60% of patients. The frequency of adverse events increases in a dose dependent manner and commonly limits the use of TMP-SMX. Reduced treatment doses of TMP-SMX for PJP reduced ADEs without mortality differences in a recent meta-analysis of observational studies. We therefore propose a Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of low dose (10 mg/kg/day of TMP) compared to the standard-of-care (15 mg/kg/day) among patients with PJP for the primary outcome of death, new mechanical ventilation, and change of treatment.
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection primarily affecting immunocompromised patients. Adults with HIV (particularly CD4 ≤200 cells/µL), solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, as well as patients on certain chemotherapies, immunosuppressant drugs, and systemic corticosteroids are at a highest risk. Although routine primary prophylaxis has diminished its prevalence, PJP still results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Retrospective cohort studies have reported mortality rates between 20-50% among non-HIV populations and 10-20% for patients with HIV. Current guidelines from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the American Society of Transplantation (AST) all recommend weight-based trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg/day of the trimethoprim component as the standard of care. Yet, higher doses of TMP-SMX are associated with serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced liver injury, cytopenia, and renal failure with adverse drug events (ADEs) reported among 20-60% of patients on treatment. To better inform the optimal dosing strategy for PJP therapy, we recently performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of reduced dose regimens of TMP-SMX in the treatment of PJP among immunocompromised adult patients with and without HIV. When comparing standard doses to reduced doses (≤10mg/kg/day of the TMP component), there was no statistically significant difference in mortality (absolute risk difference: -9% in favor of reduced dose, 95% CI: -27% to 8%) with a corresponding 18% (95% CI: -31% to -5%) absolute risk reduction of Grade III or higher adverse events. These data provide the best available evidence for treatment equipoise and highlight the need for a randomized controlled trial to directly compare dosing strategies. The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether treatment with reduced-dose TMP-SMX (10mg/kg/day) is superior to standard dose (15mg/kg/day) among immunocompromised HIV-infected and uninfected patients with PJP for the composite primary outcome of death, new mechanical ventilation, or change in treatment by Day 21.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
300
10mg/kg/day of TMP component
15mg/kg/day of TMP component
McGill University Health Centre (Royal Victoria Hospital and Montreal General Hospital)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Proportion with Treatment failure
Composite of death, new mechanical ventilation or treatment change for presumed inefficacy or severe adverse events
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion who die
All cause mortality
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion who require new mechanical ventilation
A new requirement for mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with treatment change due to inefficacy
Treatment change for presumed inefficacy
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with treatment change due to toxicity
Treatment change for drug toxicity
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with ongoing oxygen need
Requirement for oxygen according to guidelines for oxygen use in hospitalized patients
Time frame: Day 7
Proportion with ongoing oxygen need
Requirement for oxygen according to guidelines for oxygen use in hospitalized patients
Time frame: Day 14
Proportion with ongoing oxygen need
Requirement for oxygen according to guidelines for oxygen use in hospitalized patients
Time frame: Day 21
Proportion requiring new non-invasive ventilation
New non-invasive ventilation (e.g. BiPAP, high-flow nasal canulae)
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with new renal failure
New grade 3 or 4 renal failure by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition and by modified KDIGO: increase in serum creatinine by≳26.5 umol/l within 48 hours; or increase in serum creatinine to ≳1.5 times baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days; or new hemodialysis, wherein hemodialysis was not previously required.
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with hyperkalemia
Proportion with Grade 3 or 4 hyperkalemia (non-hemolyzed sample) by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with drug-induced hepatitis
Proportion with Grade 3 or 4 drug-induced hepatitis by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with Skin rash
Proportion with development of a Grade 3 or 4 skin rash (by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition) that was intolerable to the patient, persisted unabated for 48 hours or more, or had bullae or mucous-membrane involvement.
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with new cytopenias
Proportion with development of new Grade 3 or 4 cytopenias by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definition
Time frame: 21 days
Proportion with hypoglycemia
Proportion with greater than 3 episodes of documented capillary or blood hypoglycemia (≤2.5mmol/L)
Time frame: 21 days
EQ-5D-5L
Quality of life as measured by EQ-5D-5L and interpreted based on Canadian value set (see Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):98-105)
Time frame: Day 28
Quality of life measured by visual analog scale
Measured by VAS for quality of life (higher is better from 0-100)
Time frame: Day 28
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.