Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection of immunocompromised hosts which causes in significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg/day of TMP, is associated with serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced liver injury, cytopenia, and renal failure occurring among 20-60% of patients. The frequency of adverse events increases in a dose dependent manner and commonly limits the use of TMP-SMX. Reduced treatment doses of TMP-SMX for PCP reduced ADEs without mortality differences in a recent meta-analysis of observational studies. We therefore propose a Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of low dose (10 mg/kg/day of TMP) compared to the standard-of-care (15 mg/kg/day) among patients with PCP for the primary outcome of Win Ratio hierarchical composite of death, ECMO, invasive ventilation, grade 4 toxicity, non-invasive ventilation, change of therapy and length of stay.
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection primarily affecting immunocompromised patients. Adults with HIV (particularly CD4 ≤200 cells/µL), solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, as well as patients on certain chemotherapies, immunosuppressant drugs, and systemic corticosteroids are at a highest risk. Although routine primary prophylaxis has diminished its prevalence, PCP still results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Retrospective cohort studies have reported mortality rates between 20-50% among non-HIV populations and 10-20% for patients with HIV. Current guidelines from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the American Society of Transplantation (AST) all recommend weight-based trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of 15-20 mg/kg/day of the trimethoprim component as the standard of care. Yet, higher doses of TMP-SMX are associated with serious adverse events, including hypersensitivity reactions, drug-induced liver injury, cytopenia, and renal failure with adverse drug events (ADEs) reported among 20-60% of patients on treatment. To better inform the optimal dosing strategy for PCP therapy, we recently performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of reduced dose regimens of TMP-SMX in the treatment of PCP among immunocompromised adult patients with and without HIV. When comparing standard doses to reduced doses (≤10mg/kg/day of the TMP component), there was no statistically significant difference in mortality (absolute risk difference: -9% in favor of reduced dose, 95% CI: -27% to 8%) with a corresponding 18% (95% CI: -31% to -5%) absolute risk reduction of Grade III or higher adverse events. These data provide the best available evidence for treatment equipoise and highlight the need for a randomized controlled trial to directly compare dosing strategies. The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether treatment with reduced-dose TMP-SMX (10mg/kg/day) is superior to standard dose (15mg/kg/day) among immunocompromised HIV-infected and uninfected patients with PCP for the primary outcome of Win Ratio hierarchical composite of death, ECMO, invasive ventilation, grade 4 toxicity, non-invasive ventilation, change of therapy and length of stay, new mechanical ventilation, or change in treatment by Day 30.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
416
10mg/kg/day of TMP component
15mg/kg/day of TMP component
McGill University Health Centre (Royal Victoria Hospital and Montreal General Hospital)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
RECRUITINGHierarchical composite outcome
Hierarchical composite of Win Ratio at day 30: * death; * new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), * new invasive mechanical ventilation; * severe (CTCAE grade 4) adverse drug event (dermatologic, nephrologic, hematologic, neurologic, and/or endocrinologic) considered at least probable (by Leape and Bates criteria); * new non-invasive ventilation; * change of therapy (i.e., dose or agent) due to presumed treatment failure or probable adverse drug reaction (by Leape and Bates criteria); and * length of stay in hospital (amongst survivors)
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients that die (death)
All cause mortality
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients with a need for new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
New initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during hospitalization following initiation of assigned PCP treatment strategy.
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients requiring new Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation during hospitalization following initiation of the assigned PCP treatment strategy.
Time frame: Day 30
. Proportion of patients with severe (CTCAE grade 4) adverse drug event
Proportion of patients with occurence of severe (CTCAE grade 4) adverse drug event (dermatologic, nephrologic, hematologic, neurologic, and/or endocrinologic) considered at least probable (by Leape and Bates criteria).
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients with need for new non-invasive ventilation
initiation of non-invasive ventilation (including continuous positive airway pressure \[CPAP\] or bilevel positive airway pressure \[BiPAP\] during hospitalization following initiation of the assigned PCP treatment strategy.
Time frame: Day 30
Proportion of patients requiring escalation or change of PCP -directed therapy
Proportion of patients with escalation or change of PCP -directed therapy due to inadequate clinical response, disease progression, or treatment-limiting toxicity during the treatment or follow-up period.
Time frame: Day 30
Median length of stay in hospital amongst survivors
Length of hospital stay, measured in days from hospital admission to discharge among participants who survive to hospital discharge.
Time frame: Day 30
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.