The number of older people living with cognitive impairment or dementia has increased the need for simple, inexpensive interventions to improve the quality of life for such individuals and their families. Policy-makers sensitive to issues associated with mental health challenges in aging have embraced social prescribing, and a wealth of research has flourished to study non-pharmacological forms of preventative intervention. Can music-therapy(MT) be one of them? Different studies demonstrated that music stimulates a range of cognitive and social functions. However, scientific studies assessing the value of MT for those who need support in later life are limited, and rigorous research is required to generate robust scientific evidence. The focus of this study is on developing novel forms of intervention for older adults who are healthy or experiencing mild-to-moderate cognitive decline, aiming at \[i\]understanding whether MT could be used in preventive programs to support cognitive functions, \[ii\]identifying the best match between types of MT and levels of cognitive decline. Moreover, recent developments of Robotic-Assistance-Technologies offer opportunities to explore how such technologies may be used to contribute to older adults wellbeing when integrated within care routines to facilitate MT delivery. Spanning across three-studies, the investigators will examine psychosocial benefits of 5-month MT interventions (one2one, small-group MT, large-group MT) in healthy older adults and impaired older adults in care homes, compared to standard care. This latter group will receive MT afterwards. Further, researchers will investigate whether Robotic-Assistance-Technologies may enrich MT interventions and have additional benefits for the participants and translatability for community-based services. In order to measure these effects, psychological (cognitive functions, wellbeing, quality of life) and physiological (hormonal, cardiovascular \& brain activity) measures will be compared before/after the intervention. The study will elucidate relationships between different types of MT and benefits to participants wellbeing, cognitive functions \& social engagement, as well as the impact of robotic assistive technologies in public health services and social care.
The following objectives are addressed: \[Oi\] Identifying a consistent set of convergent measures for the reliable assessment of cognition/well-being in MT studies integrating psychological measures with biomarkers; \[Oii\] Implementing robust MT protocols benefitting cognitive functions/well-being in ageing individuals with varying cognitive ability; \[Oiii\] Comparing the outcomes of one2one/small-group/large-group MT intervention in function of participants' cognitive abilities (ranging from healthy ageing to moderate impairment); \[Oiv\] Devising, implementing and testing a robotic platform associated with MT to facilitate therapists/caregivers' work through novel forms of interaction with ageing individuals, and potential translatability to communities. Our research questions/hypotheses are: \[H1\] Will MT benefits healthy, mildly and moderately impaired 65+ in outcome measures? MT \> standard care. \[H2\] Which MT treatment (one2one/small group/large group) is more effective in function of older adults' cognitive level? Best outcomes predicted as follows: healthy 65+ with small-group MT; for mildly impaired 65+, one2one = small-group MT\<large group; moderately impaired 65+ with one2one MT. \[H3\] Will improvements in cognitive functions derived from MT be associated with psychophysiological biomarkers? Convergent measures will be identified linking cognitive, behavioural and physiological improvement. \[H4\] What are the benefits of MT for caregivers? A reduction in participant psychiatric and depressive symptoms will correspond to caregivers' workload and stress perception decrease. \[H5\] Are there benefits from enriching MT with robotic technology? Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that a) the robot will have the capability of delivering interactive music training sessions, with the support of caregivers not specialised in MT and b) the continuous monitoring provided by the robotic platform will enhance the information available to therapists/caregivers without significantly burdening them. MusiCare aims are: \[Ai\] Provide care-homes, communities and policy-makers with clear guidelines concerning the utility, suitability and cost-effectiveness of Music Therapy (MT) interventions (one2one vs small-group vs large group) as a prevention/rehabilitation method suitable for social prescribing and support for positive ageing. \[Aii\] Provide music therapists with robust protocols, new tests specifically designed to work through musical tasks (Music Cognitive Test). \[Aiii\] Provide scholars/practitioners with a range of objective measures to select from, depending on their needs, in order to evaluate MT interventions in ageing. \[Aiv\] Explore how the assistive robotic technologies can enrich MT in care-home settings by empowering care-home staff with a new active role in assisting rehabilitative activities as well as facilitating inter-generational communication between families and ageing relatives. \[Av\] Increase public awareness about healthy ageing, and arts \& wellbeing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
210
Music therapy is a non-pharmacological intervention, in which music and its elements are used professionally as an intervention in medical, educational, and everyday environments with individuals, groups, families, or communities who seek to optimize their quality of life and improve their physical, social, communicative, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual health and wellbeing. This therapy has shown to provide significant benefits for individuals with cognitive decline living in care homes, enhancing social-cognitive functions and reducing behavioural symptoms (Brotons \& Koger, 2000; Hsu et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017).
MHA Methodist Homes
Derby, United Kingdom
General cognitive functions change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, Folstein et al., 1975): A world standardized tool for screening general cognitive function which allows the client to be placed on a cognitive functioning scale. This test is usually used to follow the course of a disease or for monitoring the response to a specific treatment, as in this case.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Music related cognitive function change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
Music Cognitive Test (MCT, Mangiacotti, 2019; - et al., 2019b) A music-based cognitive test to measure cognitive functions typically stimulated by rehabilitative music interventions.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Attentional functions change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
TMT-A (Reitan \& Wolfoson, 1985) The test assesses selective attention and psychomotor speed.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Executive and spatial-cognitive abilities change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
Tangled Figure Test (Arcara et al., 2011) The test wants to evaluate participant's ability to perform figure-background discrimination and inhibition on the answers already provided as well as to recognize the contours of the figures. Mainly it is a test of visual recognition, but it requires the ability to reorganize a complex visual pattern in order to identify an increasing number of figures. Provides information on spatial-cognitive abilities, and executive and naming difficulties.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Quality of Life change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
• Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (Logsdon et al., 1999); The test measure quality of life in dementia. Rating is got from both the participant and the caregiver.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Mood Index change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
• Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD, Alexopoulos, Abrams, Young, \& Shamoian, 1988); This test is specifically designed to screen depressive symptoms in older adults with dementia and cognitive impairment. It is an interviewer-administered scale relying on information from caregivers and clinician's observations.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Neuro-psychiatric symptoms change from baseline/post (i.e., time 0/+5 months)
• Neuro-Psychiatric Inventory (NPI, Cummings, 1994) A tool that provides information on the presence of psychopathology in people with brain disorders. The NPI was developed for people with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, but it may be useful in the assessment of behavioural changes in other conditions.
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Cognitive reserve
· Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRI-Q, Nucci, Mapelli, Mondini, 2012). A tool used to quantify, in a standardized model, cognitive reserve through an interview to the participant or to the caregiver. The questionnaire collects demographic information regarding the school curriculum, work and type of free-time activities. These three different indices (CRI-School, CRI-Work and CRI-Free Time) are then combined into a single "Index of Cognitive Reserve". This test is useful in the research setting to balance study groups, as occur this project.
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., time 0)
Wellbeing of Older People scale
(WOOP; Hackert et al., 2020) Used as a general index of wellbeing, the scale asks participants to rate nine factors (physical health, mental health, social contacts, support, acceptance and resilience, feeling useful, independence, financial security, and living situation) according to their importance for overall wellbeing. Higher scores reflect greater self-perceived wellbeing
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
Sleep Quality Index
Measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., 1989) to assess overall sleep quality. This self-report questionnaire comprises seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction."
Time frame: Baseline vs. post- intervention period (time 0/+5-months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.