This study consists in the design, implementation and evaluation of an animation (Alerta Alcohol 2.0)- versus text-based (Alerta Alcohol) computer-tailored game intervention aimed to prevent alcohol consumption and binge drinking (BD) in Spanish adolescents. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (CRCT) is conducted to test the effectiveness of Alerta Alcohol versus Alerta Alcohol 2.0 in students aged 14 to 19 years across 24 high schools from Andalusia (southern Spain), which are randomized either to the experimental (EC-1, EC-2) or the control conditions (CC).
Alcohol use and misuse, and particularly, BD in adolescents are a highly prevalent healthcare problem that associates physical and mental health complications and community implications. The Alerta Alcohol and Alerta Alcohol 2.0 programs are based on the I-Change Model. A CRCT is carried out. The schools from Andalusia are randomized either to the experimental (EC-1, EC-2) or the control conditions (CC). The EC-1 receives an online intervention (Alerta Alcohol, which has adapted from a previous version) with personalized health advice, using textual feedback and several gamification techniques, and consists of nine sessions (performing seven of them at the high school): session 1 or baseline, sessions 2 and 3 where adolescents are provided with answers related to their views to provide highly specific feedback regarding their knowledge, risk perception, self-esteem, attitude, social influence and self-efficacy; sessions 4, 5, 7 and 8 are reinforcement sessions (booster sessions) and sessions 6 and 9 are follow-up questionnaires at six and twelve months. The EC-2 receives an improved version of Alerta Alcohol (Alerta Alcohol 2.0) using animated videos and new gamification strategies. The CC just completes the baseline and the evaluation questionnaires and then they are allowed to receive the intervention as well (as a waiting list). To test the effectiveness, the primary outcome is BD within 30 days prior to evaluation and alcohol use (high-intensity drinking, weekly and any consumption) in the previous week as secondary outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,625
The intervention consists of preventive messages about the benefits of not consuming alcohol, reducing the positive attitudes and encouraging the negative attitudes towards alcohol drinking and BD, as well as social influence and self-efficacy, by personalized feedback. Skills and action plans are encouraged to help the student to reject BD. This information is presented through different tailored text messages. Moreover, several gamification strategies are used (i.e. offering a challenge, giving different stories and the use of avatars in these stories that take place in three different scenarios: at home, at celebrations and in public places).
The intervention consists of preventive messages about the benefits of not consuming alcohol, reducing the positive attitudes and encouraging the negative attitudes towards alcohol drinking and BD, as well as social influence and self-efficacy, by personalized feedback. Skills and action plans are encouraged to help the student to reject BD. This information is presented through different animated videos. Moreover, new gamification strategies are added (i.e. giving rewards and allocating points that can be accumulated and shown in a progress ranking) to those already used in Alerta Alcohol.
Marta Lima Serrano
Seville, Spain
Change on the prevalence of binge drinking
Change on the prevalence of binge drinking (4/5 standard drink units or standard glasses of alcohol in one occasion for a girl/boy) within 30 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 6 months after the baseline
Change on the prevalence of binge drinking
Change on the prevalence of binge drinking (4/5 standard drink units or standard glasses of alcohol in one occasion for a girl/boy) within 30 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 12 months after the baseline
Change on the prevalence of high-intensity drinking
Change on the prevalence of high-intensity drinking (8/10 standard drink units or standard glasses of alcohol in one occasion for a girl/boy) within the 7 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 6 months after the baseline
Change on the prevalence of high-intensity drinking
Change on the prevalence of high-intensity drinking (8/10 standard drink units or standard glasses of alcohol in one occasion for a girl/boy) within the 7 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 12 months after the baseline
Change on the average of weekly consumption
Change on the average of the total number of glasses consumed within the 7 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 6 months after the baseline
Change on the average of weekly consumption
Change on the average of the total number of glasses consumed within the 7 days prior to evaluation.
Time frame: 12 months after the baseline
Change on the prevalence of any consumption
Change on the prevalence of any consumption
Time frame: 6 months after the baseline
Change on the prevalence of any consumption
Change on the prevalence of any consumption
Time frame: 12 months after the baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.