Esthetic and mechanical evaluation of calcium and phosphate releasing hybrid restorative material and fluoride releasing hybrid restorative material versus the conventional nanofilled resin composite in proximal carious lesions over 1 year follow-up according to the USPHS criteria.
3 groups of 45 patients will receive class II restorations by using calcium and phosphate releasing hybrid restorative material (Activa Presto), fluoride releasing hybrid restorative material (Giomer), and conventional nanofilled resin composite. Then these restorations evaluated at 24 hours after placement, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months according the modified USPHS criteria in terms of fracture, marginal adaptation, retention, anatomic form, marginal discoloration, surface texture, and color match.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
45
nanofilled resin composite
calcium and phosphate hybrid material
fluoride releasing hybrid material
Mechanical evaluation according to USPHS criteria
Fracture, Retention, Marginal adaptation, Anatomic form, and Surface roughness
Time frame: 1 year
: Esthetic evaluation according to USPHS criteria. : Esthetic evaluation according to USPHS criteria. Esthetic evaluation according to USPHS criteria
Color match, marginal discoloration, and restoration color stability
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.