The purpose of this study was to assess whether young adults could adapt to and achieve satisfaction with a daily disposable contact lens.
This was a prospective, single group, dispensing clinical trial to determine subjective and objective visual performance measures, patient satisfaction and adaptability to a commercially available daily disposable contact lens in myopic young adults over 3 months of daily lens wear.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
29
Daily disposable contact lens for 3 months
Centre for Ocular Research & Education
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Subjective Quality of Vision (QoV)
The Subjective Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire consisted of 30 items assessing 10 visual symptoms. Each symptom was evaluated using three sub-questions: frequency, severity, and bothersomeness. All subquestions were rated on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where higher values represent a higher severity, frequency, or bothersomeness. For analysis, each dimension-frequency, severity, and bothersomeness-was treated independently. Scores for each were calculated by summing the responses across all 10 symptoms, resulting in separate total scores for each dimension. Each total score ranged from 0 to 30. Thus, the Overall Frequency of Symptoms, Overall Severity, and Overall Bothersomeness scores each represent the sum of the respective ratings across all visual symptoms.
Time frame: 3 months
Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ)
Participant quality of life was measured after 3 months of lens wear using a CLIQ 28-item questionnaire. Each question was scored on a 1-5 integer scale, where 1=never and 5=always. As written, scores were not consistently associated with a better or worse outcome. An algorithm was later applied for consistency (i.e., for categories \[1,2,3,4,5\], for the first 20 questions \[5,4,3,3,3\] are assigned and for 21-28 \[2,2,3,4,5\]). After the conversion, the average of all scores was used to measure the CLIQ. The CLIQ score ranged from a minimum of 2.71 to a maximum of 5, with 5 representing the best score.
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.