This phase II trial investigates how well the addition of olaparib following completion of surgery and chemotherapy works in treating patients with pancreatic cancer that has been surgically removed (resected) and has a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. Olaparib is an inhibitor of PARP, an enzyme that helps repair deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) when it becomes damaged. Blocking PARP may help keep tumor cells from repairing their damaged DNA, causing them to die. PARP inhibitors are a type of targeted therapy.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the relapse-free survival (RFS) benefit from the addition of a maintenance olaparib following completion of chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate RFS in patients with olaparib after perioperative chemotherapy compared to those treated with perioperative therapy alone among patients who received prior platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy. II. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients treated with olaparib after adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those treated with adjuvant treatment alone. III. To analyze the efficacy of olaparib after chemotherapy in patients with a pathogenic germline BRCA or PALB2 mutation compared to those with a somatic mutation. IV. To analyze survival differences between patients who received neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy compared to those who received adjuvant therapy alone. V. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those who received =\< 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy compared to those who received \> 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy. VI. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those who received any platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy compared to no-platinum based perioperative chemotherapy. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To analyze RFS and OS differences in patients who had R1 versus (vs) R0 resections, lymph node positivity at resection, and/or elevated or rising CA 19-9 or CEA at time of study enrollment in the post-operative setting. II. To analyze RFS and OS differences with those who had resectable disease at diagnosis compared to those who did not. III. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those with gBRCA1 mutations compared to those with gBRCA2 mutations and gPALB2 mutations. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive olaparib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) scans or CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood throughout the study. ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT scans or CT/MRI and collection of blood throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 4 months for year 1, then every 6 months for years 2-10 after randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
152
Undergo collection of blood
Undergo CT or CT/MRI
Undergo CT/MRI
Given PO
Given PO
Anchorage Associates in Radiation Medicine
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDAnchorage Radiation Therapy Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDAlaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDAlaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDImprovement in relapse-free survival (RFS)
Will demonstrate an improvement in the RFS from 22 months to 44 months (hazard ratio 0.5) in patients treated with olaparib after perioperative (neoadjuvant, adjuvant or a combination) chemotherapy compared to those treated with perioperative therapy alone.
Time frame: From randomization to first documentation of disease recurrence (primary tumor relapse) or death, assessed from 22 months to 44 months
RFS
Will evaluate RFS in patients with olaparib after perioperative chemotherapy compared to those treated with perioperative therapy alone among patients who received prior platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy. Analysis will be largely exploratory. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization to first documentation of disease recurrence (primary tumor relapse) or death, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS)
Analysis will be largely exploratory. Power for overall survival in particular will be limited. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization until 10 years after registration or until death, whichever comes first
Efficacy of olaparib after chemotherapy in patients with a pathogenic germline BRCA or PALB2 mutation
Will analyze the efficacy of olaparib after chemotherapy in patients with a pathogenic germline BRCA or PALB2 mutation compared to those with a somatic mutation.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Differences in survival
Will analyze survival differences between patients who received neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy compared to those who received adjuvant therapy alone.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
RFS in those who received =< 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy compared to > 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy
Analysis will be largely exploratory. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization to first documentation of disease recurrence (primary tumor relapse) or death, assessed up to 5 years
OS in those who received =< 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy versus > 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy
Analysis will be largely exploratory. Power for overall survival in particular will be limited. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization until 10 years after registration or until death, whichever comes first
RFS in those who received any platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy versus no platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy
Analysis will be largely exploratory. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization to first documentation of disease recurrence (primary tumor relapse) or death, assessed up to 5 years
OS in those who received any platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy versus no platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy
Analysis will be largely exploratory. Power for overall survival in particular will be limited. Within each arm any proportion endpoint (toxicity, mutation rate, etc.) will be estimable with a 95% confidence interval. Arm A would have a confidence interval that is 20 percentage points wide, and Arm B would have a confidence interval that is 29 percentage points wide.
Time frame: From randomization until 10 years after registration or until death, whichever comes first
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDAnchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDKatmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDProvidence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDFairbanks Memorial Hospital
Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGKingman Regional Medical Center
Kingman, Arizona, United States
RECRUITING...and 444 more locations