Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy

Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences49 enrolled

Overview

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.

Different physical therapy treatments are being used for shoulder pathologies which include modalities (hot pack, TENS), ROM exercises, stretching, strengthening, soft tissue mobilization and set of pragmatic manual techniques.The set of pragmatic manual therapies are novel techniques (comprises of acromioclavicular mobilization, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation, RC facilitation, and PCS) and its isolated effectiveness on ROM in healthy subjects has been investigated and found effective. These studies recommended the use of a pragmatic protocol for the prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries and pathologies (unpublished data).As per our knowledge there is insufficient literature to support the comparison of the effectiveness of a set of pragmatic protocols with traditional interventions. Our research is proposed to compare the efficacy of pragmatic interventions with that of traditional interventions in patients with shoulder pathology and their effect on the quality of life.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Shoulder Pain Shoulder Impingement Shoulder Injuries Frozen Shoulder Shoulder Capsulitis

Interventions

set of pragmatic shoulder techniqueOTHER

Group A received pragmatic intervention which includes Pectoralis major and minor stretch, AC joint mobilization, rotator cuff facilitation for subscapularis and infraspinatus, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation and posterior capsular stretch.

traditional physical therapyOTHER

Group B received traditional interventions which includes modalities such as TENS and hot pack, soft tissue mobilization, joint mobilization, stretching and strengthening etc. other than pragmatic intervention

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Functional movement score 1 and 2 or limitation in Range of motion of Abduction, internal rotation, external rotation, RUBB, and RDBN. All or only one of the limitations in comparison with the unaffected shoulder joint. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with shoulder instability. Functional movement score 3 and 0. Individuals with recent fractures of fewer than 6 weeks duration. Cancerous Growth around the shoulder girdle. Breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RA arthritis patients. Long-term use of steroids and severe osteoporosis.

Locations (1)

Helping hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences Trust

Mansehra, KPK, Pakistan

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

shoulder Range of motion

will be measured in degrees by digital inclinometer

Time frame: 5 days

functional movements

will be measured in centimeters by inchi tape

Time frame: 5 days

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.