A Prospective Randomized, Multi-centre, International, Open Label, Clinical trial comparing the Selution DEB strategy versus DES strategy.
Randomized, multi-centre, international, open label, clinical trial. Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment of all lesions of the identified trial target vessel(s) with either the SELUTION SLR DEB or DES. Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 30% or FFR \< 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION DEB group (intention to treat analysis). Patients randomized to the DES arm will receive treatment using any CE-marked DES, as per standard institutional practice. Patients with failure to deliver DES will be first treated by provisional DEB using the SELUTION DEB, and failing that, with any other device deemed appropriate. Staged procedures are allowed if they are planned less than 45 days after the index procedure and are done according to the initial treatment allocation for all trial target vessels (DEB if DEB arm, DES if DES arm). The study will test: 1. for non-inferiority of a DEB plus provisional DES treatment strategy versus a systematic DES strategy with respect to the primary endpoint of TVF at 12 months. 2. for non-inferiority of a DEB plus provisional DES treatment strategy versus a systematic DES strategy with respect to the primary endpoint of TVF at 5 years. If non-inferiority is then established, superiority of the DEB strategy with TVF as an endpoint will be tested. All Patients will be followed for clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6 months, 1 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
3,326
Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR™ DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 30% or FFR \< 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION SLR™ DEB group (intention to treat analysis).
For patients randomized to the DES strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DES, but use of a SELUTION SLR™ DEB or any other device is acceptable if a DES cannot be delivered to the target lesion. For bifurcation lesions, if the side-branch requires treatment it should be treated with another DES or with POBA, at the discretion of the operator, but not with a DEB.
TVF
\- TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR) at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year after treatment
TVF
\- TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR)) at 5 years
Time frame: 5 years after treatment
Death or any MI
Cardiac death, non-cardiac death, or any Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 30 days after treatment
CD-TVR
Clinically driven - Target Vessel Revascularization
Time frame: 30 days after treatment
TVF
Target Vessel Failure
Time frame: 2, 3, 4, 5 years after treatment
Any revascularization
1. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) - any and clinically driven 2. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) - any and clinically driven 3. A new lesion revascularization in a target vessel 4. Non-Target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Myocardial Infarction (MI)
1. Peri-procedural MI 2. Target-vessel MI 3. Non-target-vessel MI 4. MI type (1 to 5) according to the 4th universal definition
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Composite of cardiac death or target vessel MI
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch
Feldkirch, Austria
University Heart Center Graz
Graz, Austria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH
Linz, Austria
University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czechia
University Hospital Ostrava
Ostrava, Czechia
SIUN sote Hospital and Healthcare center
Joensuu, Finland
CH La Rochelle
La Rochelle, France
Hôpital Jaques Cartier
Massy, France
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, France
...and 52 more locations
Composite of cardiac death or target vessel Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
All-cause mortality
* Cardiac mortality * Non-cardiac mortality
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Patient-oriented ARC-2 composite endpoint
1. All-cause mortality 2. Any stroke 3. Any MI (includes non-target vessel territory) 4. Any revascularization
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Site-reported stroke
Site-reported stroke
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Site-reported BARC 3-5 Bleeding
Site-reported BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ) 3-5 Bleeding
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries
Total costs of materials used during treatment
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries
Time of procedure. Total minutes from patient introducer introduction until removal
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries
Total hospitalization days per procedure.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding
Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from (Target Vessel Failure) TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Device success
Device success defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of \< 30% (site-reported), using the assigned device only
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Lesion success
Lesion success defined as achievement of \< 30% residual stenosis (site-reported), using any PCI method
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment
Procedure success
Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of \< 30% (site-reported) using any PCI method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat target vessel revascularization during hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment