The study aims to describe the functional level of the patients who received high intensity gait training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation at discharge, three, six and twelve months after stroke. These data will determine if the observed gains from the high-intensity gait training are retained after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
The study is a cohort-study that will have a prospective observational design. This design allows us to follow patients who presently have had a stroke and received high intensity stepping training over time. At this time little is known about the patient's functional trajectory the first 12 months after receiving high intensity stepping treatment as no study has examined long-term effects of high-intensity stepping training delivered in inpatient rehabilitation for stroke in Norway nor internationally.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
69
The intervention provided in this project is routinely delivered as a standard of care at the participating sites for patients after stroke that have a goal of walking improvement. The intervention consists of 45-60 minute, physical therapy sessions that occur five days per week (not weekends), focusing on prioritizing stepping practice at higher aerobic intensities during scheduled treatments (target training zone of 70-85% heart rate max (HRmax). Stepping is performed on treadmills and over ground, with safety harness systems and body weight support only as needed to ensure successful stepping. Tasks are progressed by increasing task difficulty as determined by the therapist. Accordingly, practice of non-walking tasks performed during physiotherapy, including bed mobility, transfers, and standing balance/ pre-gait activities, is limited.
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, Norway
Oslo municipality - Enhanced Rehabilitation Aker
Oslo, Norway
10 meter walk test
Walking speed
Time frame: 12 months
6-minute walk test
Walking distance
Time frame: 12 months
Berg balance scale
Balance measured on a scale 0-56 points, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 12 months
Steps
Number of Steps
Time frame: Daily through stay, average of 3 weeks
Intensity
Heart Rate during training
Time frame: Each PT session trough stay, and average of 3 weeks
Sit-to-stand x5
Functional strength, time to complete in sec
Time frame: 3 weeks
Sit-to-stand x5
Functional strength, time to complete in sec
Time frame: 3 months
Sit-to-stand x5
Functional strength, time to complete in sec
Time frame: 6 months
Sit-to-stand x5
Functional strength, time to complete in sec
Time frame: 12 months
Manual muscle testing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Strength of lower extremities, ordinal scale 0-5, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 3 weeks
Manual muscle testing
Strength of lower extremities, ordinal scale 0-5, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
Manual muscle testing
Strength of lower extremities, ordinal scale 0-5, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
Manual muscle testing
Strength of lower extremities, ordinal scale 0-5, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 12 months
Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT)
Evaluation tool for motot function in the upper extremity after neurological injuries. Ordinal scale 0-57, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: Weekly during inpatient stay, in average 3 weeks
Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT)
Evaluation tool for motot function in the upper extremity after neurological injuries. Ordinal scale 0-57, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 3 weeks
Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT)
Evaluation tool for motot function in the upper extremity after neurological injuries. Ordinal scale 0-57, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT)
Evaluation tool for motot function in the upper extremity after neurological injuries. Ordinal scale 0-57, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
Action-Research-Arm-Test (ARAT)
Evaluation tool for motot function in the upper extremity after neurological injuries. Ordinal scale 0-57, higher score indicate better outcome
Time frame: 12 months
EQ-5D-5L
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 3 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 3 months
EQ-5D-5L
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 6 months
EQ-5D-5L
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 12 months
PROMIS
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 3 weeks
PROMIS
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 3 months
PROMIS
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 6 months
PROMIS
Health related quality of life
Time frame: 12 months
10 meter walk test
Walking speed, time in m/sec
Time frame: Weekly through stay, average of 3 weeks
10 meter walk test
Walking speed, time in m/sec
Time frame: 3 weeks
10 meter walk test
Walking speed, time in m/sec
Time frame: 3 months
10 meter walk test
Walking speed, time in m/sec
Time frame: 6 months
6 minute walk test
Walking distance in meters
Time frame: Weekly through stay, average of 3 weeks
6 minute walk test
Walking distance in meters
Time frame: 3 weeks
6 minute walk test
Walking distance in meters
Time frame: 3 months
6 minute walk test
Walking distance in meters
Time frame: 6 months
Berg balance scale
Balance measured on a scale 0-56 points, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: Weekly through stay, average of 3 weeks
Berg balance scale
Balance measured on a scale 0-56 points, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 3 weeks
Berg balance scale
Balance measured on a scale 0-56 points, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
Berg balance scale
Balance measured on a scale 0-56 points, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
MiniBESTest
Balance measured on a scale 0-28, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: Weekly through stay, average of 3 weeks
MiniBESTest
Balance measured on a scale 0-28, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 3 weeks
MiniBESTest
Balance measured on a scale 0-28, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
MiniBESTest
Balance measured on a scale 0-28, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
MiniBESTest
Balance measured on a scale 0-28, higher scores indicate a better outcome
Time frame: 12 months
Patient Satisfaction with treatment
6 questions on satisfaction with treatment, Likert scale,
Time frame: 12 months