Multi-center, prospective double-blind randomized controlled pivotal study of noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation (NPNS) with the NTX100 Neuromodulation System for patients with medication-refractory moderate-severe primary RLS
The study consists of a series of two 4-week phases: Phase 1: Prospective, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized (Active treatment: Sham control) Phase 2: Prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, Active treatment
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
133
Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode.
Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to sham mode.
Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode.
California Center for Sleep Disorders
San Leandro, California, United States
Delta Waves, Inc.
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Neurotrials Research
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Clayton Sleep Institute
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Number of Subjects for Which the Clinician Reported "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale for TOMAC Compared to Sham
Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the investigator-rated 7-point CGI-I scale.
Time frame: Week 4
Responder Rate on Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale
Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the participant-rated 7-point PGI-I scale.
Time frame: Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.
Time frame: Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) Score
MOS-II is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information.
Time frame: Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I (MOS-I) Score
MOS-I is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute
Dublin, Ohio, United States
Bogan Sleep Consultants, LLC
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
Austin, Texas, United States
Time frame: Week 4
Mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Rating
Mean rating on the investigator-rated 7-point Likert CGI-I scale, where lower scores indicate improvement. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7).
Time frame: Week 4
Score for Question #7 of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS)
Question #7 of the IRLS assesses the participant-rated frequency (days/week) of RLS symptoms on a scale from 0 to 4, where lower scores indicate less frequent symptoms
Time frame: Week 8