As the in vivo reservoir of the Epstein-Barr virus, B cells play an important role in the perpetuation of MS disease activity. B cell depletion therapy with medications like ocrelizumab or rituximab have proved very successful in preventing clinical relapses and MRI activity in MS, but incomplete in terms of neuroprotection and symptomatic outcomes. Ocrelizumab and rituximab only target naïve and memory B cells expressing the CD20 marker but do not deplete the wide spectrum of B cell lineages including plasmablasts and plasma cells, which are also key reservoirs for EBV. This is particularly relevant to the mechanism of action of TAF, since EBV lytic reactivation occurs in coordination with B-cell differentiation. In vivo, the initiation of plasma cell differentiation provides the physiological trigger for EBV lytic reactivation, and EBV utilizes the plasma cell differentiation program to replicate. As these cells are ineffectively depleted by anti-CD20 treatment, the use of TAF would be highly complementary as an add-on treatment to anti-CD20 therapy. Anti-EBV therapy with TAF in combination with ocrelizumab or rituximab will therefore provide a synergistic approach to cover the whole EBV reservoir. The primary aims of the proposed trial are to determine if TAF, at the standard dose of 25 mg/day administered for 12 months: i) is safe and well-tolerated by individuals with RRMS over a period of treatment of 12 months; ii) leads to an overall improvement in fatigue, as assessed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale by 12 months; and iii) causes a reduction in serum concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NfL), a marker of neuronal damage in MS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
The study is designed to add on TAF to anti-CD20 therapies
Placebo arm
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Safety and tolerability of TAF by individuals with RRMS
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Change in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score (range 0-84, higher is more fatigue)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
serum concentrations of neurofilament light chains (NfL)
Reduction in serum concentrations of neurofilament light chains (NfL), a marker of neuronal damage in MS (pg/ml, the higher the more neuronal damage)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29
Change in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) score (range 0-100, higher scores are more impactful)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire
Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire (range 0-100, higher scores are healthier)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Beck Depression Inventory
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score (range 0-63, higher score indicate more severe depression)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Perceived Deficits Questionnaire
Change in Self-Reported Cognitive Dysfunction: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ)(range 0-80, higher scores indicate more perceived cognitive dysfunction)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Annualized relapse rate
Number of relapses per year
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Expanded Disability Status Scale
Change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (range 0-10, higher scores are more disabled)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Symbol Digit Modality Test
Change in Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Timed 25 Foot Walk
Change in Timed 25 Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) (timed in seconds, longer time is more disabled)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
9-Hole Peg Test
Change in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
Number of new MRI lesions
New active MRI lesions (gadolinium-enhancing, and new or enlarging T2 lesions)
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
EBV viral load
Change in EBV viral load in saliva
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months
EBV titers
Change in anti-EBV antibody titers
Time frame: Comparison of baseline to 6 months and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.