This was an open-label, randomized, dose-finding study in patients with primary or secondary MF (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System \[DIPSS\] risk score of Intermediate-1 to High-Risk) who were previously treated with ruxolitinib. The study was designed to support a pacritinib dosage selection decision with evaluation of 3 dosages.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
165
Pacritinib
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
City of Hope
Duarte, California, United States
USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford, California, United States
Spleen Volume Reduction Response (≥ 35%)
Number of patients achieving a ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, preferred) or computed tomography (CT) scans
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24
Percent Change in Spleen Volume
Percent change from baseline
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24
Total Symptom Score Analysis
Proportion of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in Total Symptom Score from baseline as assessed by the validated PRO instrument MPN-SAF TSS 2.0
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24
Patient Global Impression Assessment
Number of patients with improvement in PGIA. The Patient Global Impression Assessment questionnaire was completed at the end of Week 12 and end of Week 24. The scores were summarized by treatment group at each visit.
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 12 and 24
Spleen Length Reduction
Rate of reduction in spleen length from baseline
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 24
Frequency of RBC's or Platelet Transfusions
Number of patients
Time frame: At week 24
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction 1. = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work 2. = Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours 3. = Capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours 4. = Completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair 5. = Dead
Time frame: At weeks 4, 12, 24, and 30 days post End-of-Treatment visit
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Randomization through 30 days post End-of-Treatment visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Yale School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Medical Faculty Associates, Inc.
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
...and 52 more locations