Surgical site infections are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ideal post-operative dressing is impermeable and remains intact preventing contamination of the incision with microorganisms. In addition, it is often difficult for the patient to identify breaks in dressing integrity. This trial compares a post-operative dressing (DrySee® Inc. Houston Tx) with moisture detection allowing the patient to recognize when the dressing is compromised to a standard post-operative dressing (Tegaderm® + Pad, 3M, St. Paul, MN). The ideal dressing also allows the patient to shower without removing the dressing.
Healthy subjects drawn from the general population. will undergo a 1.5cm incision on the volar forearm of each arm. The incision will be closed with streriostrips. The subject's incisions will then be randomized to receive either a Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing or DrySee® dressing with moisture detection. The incisions will be photographed three times per week. Data on dressing wear time, integrity and adverse events will be collected every two days in the clinic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
DrySee® is a waterproof bandage designed to protect surgical incisions. It contains an indicator at the perimeter of the dressing, and at the wound site that turns blue when it comes into contact with liquid (figure 1). The indicator identifies a break in the integrity of the postoperative dressing. Changing the dressing at this point prevents bacteria from reaching the incision reducing the risk of infection. In addition, the waterproof dressing allows patients to shower or bath following surgery.
Tegaderm® is a transparent adhesive dressing commonly used as a postoperative dressing. The dressing has been shown to be superior to gauze in reducing SSIs. Tegaderm®, like DrySee,® is waterproof; however, it lacks technology that identifies a breach in dressing integrity.
Serena Group Monroeville
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
Time frame: 6-weeks
The effectiveness of liquid indication in identifying dressing compromise by visual assessment
The effectiveness of liquid indicator of the dressing turning blue
Time frame: 6-weeks
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
Time frame: 6-weeks
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment if there was a break in the dressing border.
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment of if there was a break in the dressing border at each treatment visit.
Time frame: 6-weeks
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
Time frame: 6-weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.