Randomized pilot trial of restarting DOACs at 1 week versus 4 weeks after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
Restart TICrH two-center pilot trial will assign patients with anticoagulant-associated traumatic intracranial hemorrhage to restart anticoagulation at 1 week or 4 weeks. Entry into the trial is primarily driven pragmatically by clinician intent to restart any Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC, i.e. apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran. There is no head to head evidence of superiority of any drug) after anticoagulant-associated traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and equipoise concerning restart of anticoagulation at the specified time intervals. DOAC will be at label dose with label adjustments for creatinine clearance. DOAC will be at continuation dose, i.e. not initial therapy high doses in the setting of VTE.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
Direct Oral Anticoagulation all at label dose and frequency
60-day composite endpoint
A 60-day composite endpoint that includes the following clinical events: New or expansion of intracranial hemorrhage, other BARC3a or above major hemorrhage 28, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and cardiovascular death
Time frame: 60 days
Disability Rating Scale (0-29 scale range)
Functional Measure
Time frame: 60 days
Modified Rankin Scale (0-6 scale range)
Functional Measure
Time frame: 60 day
Standard Gamble
The standard gamble is the gold standard for analysis of decision making under uncertainty 7. It is an interview technique that begins with a description of a disease state. The patient is then asked to imagine suffering the disease and having a choice between taking a medication that might cure them but also might kill them. The so-called ping-pong method requires the interviewer to start with a hypothetical scenario of 0% probability of cure and 100% probability of a painless instant death. The interviewer then asks the patient if they would take the medication. He then flips the scenario, 100% cure, 0% death. He then goes back and forth between successive scenarios of lower death higher cure and lower cure higher death. Eventually, the patient settles at an equipoise and indecision of whether the risk of dying is worth incurring to take the medication and cure the disease. This is the patient's utility for that disease, expressed as a number between 0 and 1.
Time frame: pre-randomization (The day before randomization, which must occur within 6 days of index injury) and after endpoints (the day after one of the endpoints occurs. We cannot know precisely when this will occur in the 60 day follow up period)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.