ICIS in Burn Patients Compared to Other Inflammatory Markers

Overview

The current markers of inflammation that govern antibiotic treatment have their significant limitations, especially in patients with burns. According to previously published data, the newly proposed marker of infectious inflammation, the Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS), appears to be a suitable diagnostic tool in distinguishing between inflammation of infectious and non-infectious origin in these patients. The other advantage is its low price. This study aims to compare ICIS with other used indicators of inflammation in patients with burns both children and adults.

Improving the use of antibiotics is an important patient and public health issue. The misuse of antibiotics has contributed to the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, which has become one of the most serious and growing threats to public health. The prompt initiation of antibiotics to treat infections has been proven to reduce morbidity and save lives, however, up to 30% of all antibiotics prescribed in ITUs are either unnecessary or inappropriate. One of the key problems is early and reliable detection of infection. Specificity of clinical signs and routine laboratory markers is low and they usually cannot distinguish among changes caused by the primary insult, inflammatory reaction, and infection. The gold standard of systemic bacterial and fungal infection, i.e. positive blood culture, has a sensitivity of less than 75 per cent and its contamination has been found in up to one third of results. Sputum and urine cultures are contaminated even more. Moreover, culture results are usually not known earlier than after 48 hours and antibiotic treatment should be started earlier in many cases, especially in the case of septic shock. New diagnostic modalities have been developed to sort out difficulties with early and reliable diagnosis of a presence of infection, for example measurement of Procalcitonin (PCT) or Presepsin level, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight detector mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF MS), DNA hybridisation, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, eventually polymerase chain reaction electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR ESI-MS). PCT examination is the most used laboratory test from the modalities mentioned above. Despite many positive characteristics (i.e. fast dynamics of plasma changes, higher sensitivity and specificity than C-reactive protein, ability to distinguish between G+ and G- infection), PCT specificity drops in patients with ARDS, burns, multiple injuries, rhabdomyolysis, lysis of lymphocytes, extreme metabolic situations, organ perfusion failure and after large surgical procedures. It is also worth mentioning the relatively high cost of this examination, limiting the use of this marker for routine screening, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The limiting factor for the use of the other diagnostic methods mentioned above is their availability and price, or the fact that they are not reimbursed by health insurance companies. Thus, the need for a reliable, cost-effective and available marker to facilitate antibiotic therapy continues to be a burning problem, especially in intensive care, where the development of SIRS is part of the disease in many patients. Intensive Care Infection Score (ICIS) has been proposed as a suitable diagnostic indicator for the presence of infection in these patients. Five parameters are used to calculate this score: * Number of neutrophil segments * The number of immature granulocytes * Mean fluorescence intensity of neutrophil segments * Difference in haemoglobin concentration of mature and young cells * Number of antibody secreting lymphocytes These parameters characterize the early innate immune response. The maximum ICIS value is 20. ICIS changes occur in the order of hours and are capable of detecting early local and systemic infection prior to the development of clinical symptoms. The advantages are the low cost of the examination which can be used to routinely screen patients, the speed of results (up to 15 min), sensitivity, assessment of the severity of infection, and the fact that no extra blood sample is needed. Measurements are done from a blood sample taken for differential blood count by flow fluorescence cytometry. Nevertheless, ICIS suitability and accurance in both adult and pediatric burn patients has not been proved yet. This study is aimed to investigate ICIS reliability in burns.