Extended-infusion of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Intermittent Infusion

Overview

Continuous-infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam over 4 hrs instead of 30-minute intermittent dosage regimen has shown observable outcomes. Our objective is to assess whether continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam is superior in terms of efficacy, safety and cost to the intermittent regimen to treat suspected or proved infections due to gram negative bacteria. The setting is Critical Care Medicine Department at Cairo University Hospitals. Methods A prospective randomized comparative study.

A total of 56 patients were recruited from ICU- Cairo University Hospitals. All adult critically ill patients admitted to Critical Care Medicine Department with suspected or confirmed bacterial infections on admission or during their ICU stay were assessed for inclusion into the study. All patients were subjected to the following: A. Patient's full history: Age, sex ,medical history ,concurrent diseases, concurrent medications B. Patient evaluation and assessment: The following were evaluated at baseline and periodically thereafter until day of stopping antibiotic, discharge and/or death : 1. Kidney functions (Serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen) 2. Liver functions (ALT, AST, Bil D, Bil T, Albumin) 3. Complete blood count 4. Microbiological Evaluation: Cultures and sensitivity tests from suspected site of infection 5. Clinical signs and symptoms of infection documented by the attending physician on patient's medical record 6. APACHE II Variables

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes