The aim is to evaluate in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study the healing of a GTR procedure, when it is combined with an immediate orthodontic tooth movement or used alone. Clinical, radiological and reentry (histological) evaluation of a regenerative surgical method (GTR + grafting material) with different postsurgical healing patterns in the treatment of wide, non-containing intrabony defects.
There is limited histological data in literature on the behavior of xenogeneic graft materials in intrabony defects used in periodontal regenerative therapy followed by orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). This clinical study aims to clinically and histologically evaluate the healing response of the periodontal tissues and the healing pattern of a non-resorbable graft material, when they are exposed to orthodontic forces. Therefore teeth presenting non-contained intrabony defects in combination with pathologic tooth migration (PTM) are included in this prospective clinical study. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with the application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and a resorbable collagen membrane is utilized to surgically treat the periodontal defects, which is followed by a random allocation of the patients into test or control group. Subject teeth undergo an early initiated orthodontic treatment after surgery or stay splinted without any tooth movement in the latter groups, respectively. Teeth in test group can be further divided into subgroups, depending if they are moved toward to the former defect (pressure site) or moved away from the defect (tension site). After 9 months of healing a reentry surgery is performed, when a biopsy core is removed with a microtrephine from the previous defect site. The sample is evaluated by means of histology supplemented with histomorphometry, which is the primary outcome variable. Periodontal clinical parameters measured at baseline and at 9 months serves for secondary outcomes. Several studies confirmed the success of graft materials in such comprehensive treatment approaches clinically, but we lack the human histologically proved data, whether DBBM bone substitute can be used safely when the tooth is exposed to OTM. Our main question is how orthodontic induced bone remodelling interferes with these graft particles, can they heal the same or even better compared to control sites. Tissue response might be different also in the case of the two test subgroups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
36
GTR is handled with the utilization of a coronally advanced flap, followed by a thorough debridement of the denudated root surface and the intrabony component. Regenerative materials are resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide, Geistlich Phara AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (BioOss, Geistlich Phara AG), finally surgery is finished with multilayer suturing technique.
An early initialization of the tooth movement with the help of a multibond fixed orthodontic device utilizing low level of continuous orthodontic forces.
Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology
Budapest, Hungary
Amount of newly formed bone by means of histomorphometry
The percentage of newly formed bone of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Amount of graft material by means of histomorphometry
The percentage of graft material (BioOss, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen) of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Amount of connective tissue by means of histomorphometry
The percentage of connective tissue of the former periodontal defect after a biopsy harvesting during a reentry surgery 9 months after the GTR intervention
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
CAL
Clinical attachment level gain
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
PPD
Pocket probing depth reduction
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
GR
Change in gingival recession
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Bone gain
The absolute fill of the periodontal defect
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Bone loss
The change of the crestal bony wall
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively
Intrabony fill
The change of the intrabony component compared to the initial intrabony defect depth (in percentage)
Time frame: 9 months postoperatively