A feasibility study is to assess the preliminary safety and performance of the Xeltis hemodialysis access (aXess) graft.
A prospective, single arm, non-randomized FIH feasibility study to evaluate the preliminary safety and performance of the Xeltis hemodialysis access graft in subjects older than 18 years with end-stage renal disease, who plan to undergo hemodialysis for at least the first 6 months after study access creation, and are deemed not suitable for fistula creation by the operating surgeon.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Patients will be implanted with one Xeltis hemodialysis access device (aXess) in the arm
A.Z. Sint Jan
Bruges, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk, Belgium
UZ Ghent
Ghent, Belgium
Universita degli studi dell'Insubria
Varese, Italy
Freedom from device related serious adverse events
The number of patients who have a device related serious adverse event
Time frame: 6 months
Functional patency of graft
The number of patients with a functionally patent graft
Time frame: 6 months
Freedom from device related serious adverse events
The number of patients who have a device related serious adverse event
Time frame: 12, 18, 24, and 60 months
Functional patency of graft
The number of patients with a functionally patent graft
Time frame: 12, 18, 24, and 60 months
Patency (primary, primary assisted, and secondary) of graft
The number of patients with a patient graft
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months
Time to potential central venous catheter removal
Time that patients with a central venous catheter could have had the catheter removed after the Xeltis hemodialysis access graft was placed
Time frame: Assessed retrospectively at 30 days
Time to loss of patency (primary, primary assisted, and secondary)
Number of days from implant to graft occlusion in patients who no longer have a patent graft
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months
Rate of access related interventions required to achieve/maintain patency
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga, Latvia
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos Corpus A.
Vilnius, Lithuania
Number of interventions that were performed on grafts to achieve/maintain patency
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Rate of access site infections
Number of access graft sites that become infected
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Proportion of hemodialysis (HD) sessions completed via central venous catheter
Number of hemodialysis sessions performed with a central venous catheter vs. the number of sessions performed with the Xeltis hemodialysis access graft
Time frame: 12 months
Number of days with central venous catheter in place (catheter contact time)
Number of days the patients have a central venous catheter in place irrespective of access abandonment
Time frame: 12 months
Pseudoaneurysm formation
Number of grafts that have a pseudoaneurysm form
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months