The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of a 16-week center-based Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT-C) versus home-based Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT-H) in targeting social communication deficits in young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with significant language delay. The two groups will also be compared to a control group that consists of children who are receiving treatment as usual (TAU).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
120
Pivotal Response Treatment in autism center.
Pivotal Response Treatment in home environment.
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
RECRUITINGChange in Number of Child Utterances during the Parent-Child portion of the Structured Lab Observation (SLO).
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change on MacArthur-Bates Communication Development Inventory (CDI) Scores
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale- 3 (VABS-3) Scores
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Social Responsiveness Scale, 2nd Edition (SRS-2) Scores
Social Responsiveness Scale, 2nd Edition (SRS-2) scores measure social abilities with lower scores meaning better social abilities.
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change From Baseline in Parent Rated Stanford Social Dimension Scale (SSDS) Scores
Higher Scores on the Stanford Social Dimension Scale mean better social functioning and lower scores mean worse social functioning (Range: 58-290).
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change on the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC) direct child observation assessment.
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
Change on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale.
Time frame: Baseline,16 Weeks.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.